[2022] NZEmpC 78 Vulcan Steel Ltd v Manufacturing & Construction Workers Union [pdf, 409 KB]
...for the employee to nominate the choice of drug testing; or alternatively, if there is a gap, the threshold for implying a term is not met, and any problem should be resolved in bargaining between the parties. [11] The Supreme Court in Bathurst Resources Ltd v L & M Coal Holdings Ltd, recently said that in an implication case, the Court must:3 (a) first, interpret the words used by the parties in their agreement; and (b) if that exercise results in a gap, consider whether the...