Haupini v SRCC Holdings Ltd (Application by Defendant for Costs) [2013] NZHRRT 23 [pdf, 104 KB]
...Director [46] While the Director is not immune from an adverse award of costs (see s 92C(4) of the Act) the fact that the Director has an important role in facilitating access to human rights protection in New Zealand, is publicly funded and has limited resources are all highly relevant factors in the assessment of costs. See IDEA Services Ltd v Attorney- General (No. 3) [2011] NZHRRT 21 (28 September 2011) at [76] [d]. On appeal in Attorney-General v IDEA Services Ltd (In Statutory Man...