Search Results

1. [2014] NZEmpC 77 Rodkiss v Carter Holt Harvey Limited [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...for the plaintiff submitted that Rose v Order of St John was of assistance in distilling the relevant principles from previous interpretations of s 148 by the Court. 8 Counsel also referred to Director of Proceedings v O’Malley, where the Human Rights Review Tribunal held that confidentiality attaches to the mediation not an event giving rise to it. 9 It was submitted that on the facts of the present case, the defendant was aware mediation had ended and that the plaintiff...

2. 2017 NZSSAA 057 (10 October 2017) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...officials. [29] The appellant said that he had handed over his time sheets to Ministry officials; they have apparently been misplaced. The appellant said that he had reported all his income, but acknowledged that there could have been some element of human error which resulted in some small discrepancies. He was confident, however, that what he had reported was accurate. [30] The appellant was the only witness who gave evidence on oath at the hearing. Despite being on notice of t...

3. The Treaty of Waitangi Past and Present Teacher's Guide [pdf, 8.8 MB]

   ...their cultural groups and with other cultural groups. 2b LEVEL 5 OF THE SOCIAL STUDIES CURRICULUM Section 1 . . Social Organisation Section 2 Place & Environment ... How and why people seek to gain and maintain social justice and human rights. '. .. . Why people move between places and the consequences of this for the people and the places. 1b 2a FURTHER RESOURCES - AN ANNOTATED LIST GENERAL Useful for more than one section of the resource Arbury,...

4. Cabinet paper relating to Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators (Minimum Training) Amendment Regulations and other legislative instruments [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...effect on 8 April 2019. Compliance 26. These legislative instruments comply with each of the following: 26.1 the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi; 26 2 the rights and freedoms contained in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 or the Human Rights Act 1993; 1 Most amendments are already in effect and the remaining amendments will be brought into effect in late 2019. 1e0uwhavt9 2019-05-07 10:54:49RE LE AS ED B...

5. D-G Conservation - EiC - M J Brass - Planning (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 455 KB]

   ...M Brass Evidence: Proposed Plan Change 7 to Regional Plan: Water for Otago [DOC-6540513] 5 for Renewable Electricity Generation 2011, and the National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health 2011. Through both local government and NZPI I have also provided input into various Quality Planning guidance notes. 6. I hold a Bachelor of Science degree (Geology, 1984) and a Diploma for Graduates (Ecology / Environment 1991...

6. [2008] NZEmpC AC 8B/08 Taylor Worldwide Publishers Ltd (In Liquidation) v von Tunzelman [pdf, 42 KB]

   ...Family Trust. Previous editions of Best of the Best were published by Worldwide Annuals Limited. Mr Taylor was responsible for sales and marketing for Worldwide Publishers Limited. Mrs Taylor dealt with administration, day to day finances and human resource issues. She described it as a very small family business. [13] It is not disputed that Mr von Tunzelman was employed to work on Best of the Best. However to determine the identity of Mr von Tunzelman’s employer it is nec...

7. National Standards Committee v Toner [2013] NZLCDT 38 [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...placed before the learned District Court Judge, the practitioner was discharged without conviction. [5] Because of the steps which the practitioner had taken to address the underlying causes of her offending the NSC adopted what could be seen as a humane and rehabilitation-focussed approach to the penalty. It was initially urged upon the Tribunal that a suspension for two years would be appropriate in all of the circumstances. [6] The practitioner’s submissions were not far apa...

8. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination - summary document - Korean [pdf, 421 KB]

   ...위해서 여러분의 피드백(의견 수렴)을 통해 도움을 받고 싶습니다. 의견 수렴 기간은 2021년 6월 25일부터 8월 6일까지입니다. 의견은 시민공간 웹사이트(https://consultations.justice.govt.nz), 이메일(humanrights@justice.govt.nz), 우편(Human Rights, Ministry of Justice, SX10088, Wellington)을 통해 보내실 수 있습니다. 비밀 보장 및 개인 정보 관련 내용을 포함하여 의견 제출 절차에 관한 자세한 사�...

9. [2021] NZACC 127 - Jones v ACC (11 August 2021) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...for recalling judgments. Grounds relied upon by Mr Jones [36] In summary, Mr Jones submits that the Authority held that the Corporation had a right to destroy his 1991 claim file and this finding is wrong having regard to the decision of the Human Rights Review Tribunal (“HRRT”) in Vivash v Accident Compensation Corporation.11 [37] Further, he asserts that the HRRT is a superior court to the Authority and that the Authority’s finding that the Corporation had not acted crimi...

10. [2020] NZIACDT 52 - TBE v Proudman (4 December 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...overall, is the penalty which is fair, reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances. DISCUSSION [27] Ms Proudman’s initial mistake was one of interpretation of the immigration instructions. While it could not be described as minor or simple human error, as the Tribunal pointed out in the substantive decision, Ms Proudman’s subsequent conduct has significantly exacerbated her wrongdoing.8 She concealed Immigration New Zealand’s decision from her client, falsely claimin...