3764 items matching your search terms
...Employment Relations Authority. 1 The 1 [2011] NZERA Auckland 338. plaintiff opposed the application and applied to strike out the evidence contained in the affidavit of Collette Firth, the human resource operations manager for the defendant’s wood products division, filed in support of the defendant’s application. [3] It is convenient to deal with the plaintiff’s strike out application first. The plaintiff submits...
...of subdivision consent shall be paid prior to Section 224(c) certification. 3. During site works if European or Chinese artefact material is discovered the consent holder shall immediately contact Heritage New Zealand. 4. During site works if koiwi (human skeletal remains), waahi taoka (resource of importance), waahi tapu (place or feature of special significance) or artefact material are discovered, then work shall stop to allow a site inspection by the appropriate runanga and their advisors...
...(Extension of time to commence proceedings) [2023] NZHRRT 33.] 2 In this case notice was given under PA, s 98(3) that the Privacy Commissioner, having commenced an investigation, decided not to further investigate the complaint or matter. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2023] NZHRRT 33 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 on 30 March 2022. Accordingly, a jurisdictional issue arises as Miss Lawson’s claim was lodged after the prescribed six-month limitation period. [3] Mi...
...with the legitimate communications outside prison boundaries is remote. Freedom from Discrimination 18. Section 19 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right of everyone to freedom from discrimination on the grounds set out in section 21 of the Human Rights Act 1993, including religious belief. 19. The Bill amends section 79 of the Act to ensure that section 129(a) (which forbids the consumption of alcohol by prisoners other on medical grounds) does not operate to prohibit the con...
...ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(c) of the Privacy Act 1993 (PA) for hurt and humiliation and injury to the feelings of Ms Cook. Costs were reserved. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Cook v Manawatu Community Law Centre (Costs) [2021] NZHRRT 57] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2021] NZHRRT 57 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [2] Costs submissions have now been received and in brief: [2.1] Ms Cook seeks costs of $7,500 (with no GST) against the MCLC; [2.2] The MCLC seeks costs...
...of the 2011 Rugby World Cup. INCONSISTENCY WITH SECTION 19(1) OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS ACT 5. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act provides: ‘Everyone has the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds of discrimination in the Human Rights Act 1993.’ 6. Section 21 of the Human Rights Act 1993 specifies the prohibited grounds of discrimination. These grounds include, inter alia, ‘disability’ which includes: • physical disability or impairment • physi...
...now more than ever, we need transformative change not silent support. Over the last 30 years, we’ve seen a shift in our justice system; one that’s predicated on crime, punishment, and targets. A justice system that has lost sight of what’s humane and effective for offenders, victims, and the public isn’t a system I want to lead, and not a system New Zealanders deserve. I was heartened to attend the launch of the Borrin Foundation last week. The Foundation was set up at the be...
...essential service at all alert levels. The public health imperatives of operating at Alert Level 3 and 4 has significantly restricted the ability of the courts to hear criminal cases. “We know that delays in the justice system have a significant human cost. This is causing distress for victims, for defendants, and for their whānau as they wait for cases to be heard in court. It is therefore important that we are able to increase the amount of work done across the courts by reason...
...jurisdiction for the Tribunal to accept his intended proceedings, the Secretary by email dated 15 March 2021 asked Mr Jones to provide a copy of: 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Re Jones (Rejection of Statement of Claim) [2021] NZHRRT 19.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2021] NZHRRT 19 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [3.1] Any notice of decision given by the Privacy Commissioner under s 77(2)(a) and (3) of the Act, [3.2] Any certificate of investigation. [3.3]...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 6 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA Reference No. HRRT 024/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN YAN GUO PLAINTIFF AND PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Ms Y Guo in person assisted by Ms Li Yan (her mother) as McKenzie friend Mr TL Clarke for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers...