Search Results

Search results for human.

3763 items matching your search terms

  1. [2019] NZEnvC 022 Fitzgerald v Kaikoura District Council [pdf, 1.8 MB]

    ...consent authority asbuilt plans of all new serves, prior to issuing the 224 certificate to demonstrate compliance with the above conditions. Archaeological Matters 25. Where during excavation or land disturbance, any archaeological artefact or human remains are accidentally discovered, work sha ll cease immediately and the consent holder must consult with a representative of Te Runanga 0 Kaikoura and Heritage New Zealand (and the Police in the case of human remains), to determine wh...

  2. Tucker v Real Estate Agents Authority (Application for Closed Hearing) [2019] NZHRRT 49 [PDF, 287 KB]

    ...s 41 of the Act it extended the time limit prescribed by s 40. 1 [This decision is to be cited as Tucker v Real Estate Agents Authority (Application for Closed Hearing) [2019] NZHRRT 49] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2019] NZHRRT 49 2 [2] The claim will be heard at Auckland on Monday 4 November 2017. Two days have been set aside. The disputed facts being within a small compass only two witnesses are to give evidence, being...

  3. Pilon v Iyengar and C&CDHB [2012] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 56 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2012] NZHRRT 9 Reference No. HRRT 012/2011 UNDER SECTION 51 OF THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN ERIC RICHARD PILON PLAINTIFF AND VASUDHA IYENGAR FIRST DEFENDANT AND CAPITAL AND COAST DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD SECOND DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr S Hickey, Member Mr R Musuku, Member Mr Pilon in person Mr MF McClelland for First Defen...

  4. HIJ v RST and UVW (Publication) [2013] NZHRRT 41 [pdf, 152 KB]

    1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF PARTIES (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 41 Reference No. HRRT 024/2010 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN HIJ PLAINTIFF AND RST FIRST DEFENDANT AND UVW SECOND DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr GJ...

  5. [2017] NZEnvC 170 Auckland Council v Frogley [pdf, 359 KB]

    ...contravene a number of rules in the Auckland Unitary Plan: Operative in Part (AUPOP), as described in greater detail below, and that these contraventions 5 cause or are likely to cause adverse effects on the environment, including risks to human health and risks to the environment. [8] The orders are sought on an urgent basis without notice to maintain the status quo in circumstances where the Council considers there are good grounds to believe that more unconsented dwellings ar...

  6. Cooper v Hamilton Pharmacy 2011 Ltd (Discovery) [2018] NZHRRT 28 [pdf, 267 KB]

    1 (1) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 28 Reference No. HRRT 068/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN SIMON COOPER PLAINTIFF AND HAMILTON PHARMACY 2011 LIMITED DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Ms AV Twaddle for plaintiff Ms J Forrest for defendant...

  7. Mr-Rasheeds-Submissions-of-37-Families.pdf [pdf, 619 KB]

    ...the Bill of Rights, sets the legal standard that the Coroner must comply with and against which any decisions made by the Coroner would fall to be assessed (regardless of whether the Coroner carries out a separate determination of compliance with human rights issues). 6. Further, s 8 incorporates a “protective obligation” – in the sense that it imposes duties on the state when it is in a position of knowledge of potential risk to a person and fails to take steps to avert that r...

  8. Mitchell v Corrections [2024] NZHRRT 13 [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...However, the transitional provisions in the Privacy Act 2020 sch 1 cl 9(1) provide that these proceedings must be continued and completed under the 2020 Act, but that does not alter the relevant legal rights and obligations in force at the time IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2024] NZHRRT 13 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 of the Department of Corrections (‘Corrections’) regarding matters relating to her treatment while in the custody of Corrections. [2] In respon...

  9. Hardy v CAC 302 [2016] NZREADT 52 [pdf, 149 KB]

    ...the agency’s policies and processes support the training and management of licensed salespersons, but submit that these policies without more are not sufficient to comply with s 50. They concluded by submitting: Barfoot & Thompson needs human actors to draft policies and manuals but also to carry out the day-to-day active supervision of salespeople. Obviously salespeople experiencing issues with a transaction need a person that they can turn to for advice. Their work need...

  10. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Hanif [2019] NZLCDT 13 [pdf, 156 KB]

    ...serious offences, and whose offending was said to have been facilitated by the practitioner’s offending. 4 subject of a conviction under the Immigration Act, described in the judgement (sic) of Judge Hikaka (at [14]) as “trafficking in human beings by deception”. Mr Ali was evidently in the practice of recruiting workers from Fiji and bringing them to New Zealand on a visitor visa, then setting them to work in his business in this country;3 (b) The three individuals in...