3761 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 21 Reference No. HRRT 046/2017 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN KATHY APOSTOLAKIS PLAINTIFF AND PUBLIC TRUST DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mrs K Apostolakis in person Ms L Gilmor for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 30 May 2018...
...another government agency. CONSISTENCY WITH THE BILL OF RIGHTS ACT Section 19(1) – Freedom from Discrimination 8. Section 19(1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds of discrimination in the Human Rights Act 1993. These grounds include, amongst others, age, marital status, family status and employment status. 9. In assessing whether there is a limit on the right to freedom from discrimination we consider whether:1 a. the leg...
...of complaint under the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (Act) and also breaches the Licensed Immigration Advisers Code of Conduct 2014 (Code). [3] Mr Guich acknowledges he made a mistake in his calculation, but contends that a one-off human error of that nature cannot amount to negligence or a breach of professional standards. The essential issue to consider is whether Mr Guich’s error is one which a prudent, diligent adviser could have made. BACKGROUND [4] Mr Guich, a...
1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING DISCLOSURE OF MEDICAL REPORTS (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF CHAIRPERSON OR OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 26 Reference No. HRRT 073/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN RAYMOND KEITH WILLIAMS PLAINTIFF AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION DEFENDANT AT ROTORUA BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms L J Alaeinia, Member Mr M J M...
...derogatory remarks about her. In relation to another member of her faculty the complaint was that he dealt with her aggressively. Professor Willis later summarised the complaints as allegations of bullying. [9] Professor Willis, assisted by a human resources manager, interviewed Dr Sawyer, the persons complained about, and several witnesses to ascertain what (if anything) had occurred. Notes were taken of each interview and statements were prepared from them. Each person who w...
...with declining richness at some 16 monitoring and possible likely improvements at six sites; (e) E. coli concentrations demonstrated D-band standards with studies indicating this may result from ruminant contamination, wildfowl, plant decay and human contamination. Ivlicrobial source tracking shows ruminant contamination contributes around 66%, wildfowl 24%, plant decay 7%, 2% undetermined and 1 % human contamination; and (f) That around half the sites are D-band status based on d...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 7 Reference No. HRRT 076/2015 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN TE RINGA MANGU NATHAN MIHAKA PLAINTIFF AND HOUSING NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON – ON THE PAPERS BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms DL Hart, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr TRMN Mihaka in person assisted by Ms K Raue as McKenzie friend Ms FJ...
...deduction of her Russian pension is suspended while payment of her Russian pension is suspended. 22. XXXX’s submissions express her willingness to refund the New Zealand Government any Russian pension payment subsequently received. Breach of Human rights 23. For XXXX it is also submitted that the New Zealand response to the Russian/Ukraine war inadvertently discriminates against Russian born New Zealand citizens perceived as eligible for a Russian pension. It is submitted th...
...reducing nicotine levels). Consistency of the Bill with the Bill of Rights Act Section 19 – freedom from discrimination 7. Section 19 (1) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms the right to freedom from discrimination on the grounds set out in the Human Rights Act 1993 (the Human Rights Act). 8. The key questions in assessing whether there is a limit on the right to freedom from discrimination are: a. does the legislation draw a distinction on one of the prohibited grounds of...
...consider that Ms WZ had left messages for her on an incorrect phone number and that these messages had been brought to the attention of the opposing party who had used the information against her; and (d) requests made by Ms WZ to secure her human resources file were seriously inadequate. [16] Ms WZ’s counsel responded to Ms FL’s review application. [17] It was submitted for Ms WZ that: (a) Ms WZ had provided a comprehensive response to Ms FL’s complaints in the submissi...