[2006] NZEmpC WC 17/06 Bryson v Three Foot Six Ltd [pdf, 54 KB]
...that short delay. No evidence of prejudice was adduced and the defendant’s witnesses were required in any event for the 90-day issue to be heard. [14] For the same reason, I have been able to evaluate in full the merits of the substantive appeal on both the issues Mr Bryson wishes to challenge. [15] In these circumstances, there is a strong degree of artificiality in assessing the merits of the claim for the purpose of this application separate from that of the appeal. [16] A...