Search Results

1. Waaka v Harrison - Poike 14 (Waimapu Marae) (2015) 101 Waikato Maniapoto MB 216 (101 WMN 216) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...inquiry into the marae, and that I may, amongst other things, enforce the obligations of the trustees and also remove the trustees. 16 [26] On the question of removal of trustees, pursuant to s 240 of the Act, I refer to the recent Court of Appeal decision of Rameka v Hall 17 . In that case the Court of Appeal 13 Second affidavit of Judith Wood, 27 February 2015, exhibit “B”. 14 Above n 12. 15 Hamilton – Tuahu 3X (Ere...

2. CAC 10054 v Hume [2013] NZREADT 91 [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...stated that on 25 September 2012 the Authority made enquiries with the registrar of the Wanganui District Court and received confirmation that on 30 April 2012 the defendant had been convicted on a charge of threatening to injure (since confirmed on appeal) and the conviction related to the events of 27 July 2011 described by Ms Q before us and covered above. [26] All the prosecution witnesses were carefully cross-examined by the defendant. Further Evidence for the Prosecution [27...

3. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – summary record 10th-11th reports [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...assisting a party to win a share of the party vote, there would be an incentive for parties to attract votes of particular ethnic groups by placing candidates from those groups in prominent positions on the party list or by adopting policies that would appeal to them. A party representing the interests of a particular ethnic group could also be established to contest the party list vote. 9. Turning to the subject of economic restructuring and its impact on employment and welfare, he said that...

4. [2021] NZACC 50 - Astle v ACC (17 March 2021) [pdf, 224 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2021] NZACC 50 ACR 18/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ADELE ASTLE Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 11 February 2021 Heard at: Christchurch/Otautahi Appearances: Mr T Yates, advocate for the appellant via telephone Mr H Evans f...

5. [2022] NZACC 132 - GG v ACC (11 July 2022) [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...AND ANY DETAILS THAT MIGHT IDENTIFY THE APPELLANT IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 132 ACR 290/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN GG Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 4 July 2022 Held at: Rotorua/Rotorua-Nui-A-Kahumatamomoe Appearances: The Appellant is self-repr...

6. [2009] NZEmpC AC 16A/09 Peterson & Anor v B Engineering Ltd & Anor [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...has a statutory manager appointed, or any other legal case exists where that party cannot pay it’s (sic) debts in a timely manner, or a resolution is passed for the winding up of that party, or either party gains a judgement against it to which no appeal is pending and remains unsatisfied for more than 14 days, or either party does any act or thing calculated to damage the other party’s goodwill, reputation or intellectual or industrial property, then an automatic Terminati...

7. Te Manutukutuku (Issue 82) [pdf, 14 MB]

   ...within the wider Health Services and Outcomes Inquiry. An issue arose in the Oranga Tamariki urgency as to whether the Tribunal had the power to summons the Minister for Children to explain her position. As noted later in this issue, the Court of Appeal upheld the Tribunal’s authority to do so. All this activity takes place against the backdrop of the proposed review of the Tribunal’s scope and purpose, as set out in the coalition agree- ment between the National and New Zeala...

8. [2013] NZEmpC 39 Rittson-Thomas t/a Totara Hills Farm v Davidson [pdf, 150 KB]

   ...Coincidentally, that case also concerned the dismissal on grounds of redundancy of a farm employee but that is of no significance. [48] In Simpsons Farms I said that I did not understand Parliament to have intended the principles stated by the Court of Appeal in GN Hale & Sons Ltd v Wellington Caretakers IUOW 3 to be affected when it enacted the Employment Relations Act and, in 2004, s 103A in particular. That statement may be interpreted to say that an employer only has to pe...

9. Aldridge & Ors as Trustees of the SL & KM Aldridge Family Trust v Boe [2012] NZWHT Auckland 27 [pdf, 202 KB]

   ................................................................................................ 31 Page | 4 PROCEDURAL ISSUES [1] This claim was originally heard in the Tribunal in August 2010. An appeal was filed against the determination and the High Court1 dismissed two of the four affirmative defences run by the respondents. The High Court referred the remaining issues back to the Tribunal for determination. The...

10. Stock v Morris - Wainui 2D2B (2012) 41 Taitokerau MB 121 (41 TTK 121) [pdf, 259 KB]

    ...Awanui a Haparapara 2B1B2 (2009) 108 Opotiki MB 255 (108 OPO 255) [Insley]. 14 Tohu – Te Horo 2B2B2B (2007) 7 Whangarei Appellate Court MB 34 (7 APWH 34) [Tohu]. 15 Bidois and others – Te Puna 154D3B2B (2008) 12 Waiariki Appellate MB 102 (12 APPEAL 102) [Bidois]. 41 Taitokerau MB 131 [33] Second, there is the related issue of whether a house that is the subject of a s 18(1)(a) order can pass by succession. This is relevant as, if I make an order in favour of Mariao, the lon...