Search Results

1. [2023] NZEmpC 57 New Zealand Steel Ltd v Haddad [pdf, 444 KB]

   ...NZ Steel in essence submitted that absent a contractual requirement, there is no obligation to redeploy at common law or under statute. [54] In particular, it relies on New Zealand Fasteners Stainless Ltd v Thwaites, a decision of the Court of Appeal, which it submitted is still good law and should be followed despite being decided under the Employment Contracts Act 1991.12 [55] Specifically NZ Steel relies on the following:13 [25] In a situation of genuine redundancy, where th...

2. Whooley - Ngaiotonga 1B1 and 2B1 and Lots 1 - 2, and 3 DP383105 (2014) 71 Taitokerau MB 38 (71 TTK 38) [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Gully), which is the only decision of that Court that touches on sufficiency of support in relation to exchange orders.3 2 Rudolph v Reti – Otetao B3A2 [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 143 (2011 APPEAL 143) at [40]. 3 Hanford v Māori Trustee – Ohiro 19 & 21 Block 10 (Polhill Gully) (2006) 15 Aotea Appellate MB 218 (15 WGAP 218). 71 Taitokerau MB 48 [37] The leading Māori Appellate Court decision on s 288(2)(b) is Wh...

3. [2024] NZEnvC 105 Capil Grove Limited v Southland Regional Council [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   CAPIL GROVE LIMITED V SOUTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 105 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN CAPIL GROVE LIMITED (ENV-2023-CHC-094) Appellant AND SOUTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge K G Reid – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Consent Determinati...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 150 Hamilton Homezone Limited v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 26 MB]

   Hamilton Homezone Limited v Hamilton City Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 150 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 120 the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN HAMILTON HOMEZONE LIMITED (ENV-2021-AKL-000127) Appellant AND HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Chief Environment Court Judge D A Kirkpatrick sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Date of Order: 15 Au...

5. [2022] NZEnvC 076 Pipers Limited Partnership v Auckland Council [pdf, 537 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 076 IN THE MATTER OF appeals under cl 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN PIPERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ENV-2020-AKL-000031) WEITI HEADWATERS LIMITED (ENV-2020-AKL-000032) Appellants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent KUMEU-HUAPAI RESIDENTS AND RATEPAYERS ASSOCIATION INC Section 274 Party Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Envir...

6. [2024] NZEmpC 125 Cronin-Lampe v Minister of Education [pdf, 607 KB]

   ...previously, for approximately two and a half years whilst Mr and Mrs Cronin-Lampe were seeking ACC cover their claims were not actively pursued in this Court.12 [9] Then, a preliminary ACC point was dealt with by this Court.13 MHS brought a subsequent appeal in the Court of Appeal which was dismissed. That Court confirmed that s 133(5) of the AC Act did not bar Mr and Mrs Cronin-Lampe’s claims in this Court being heard.14 [10] Once these issues were dealt with, the matter was...

7. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AC evidence chief Stephen Brown [pdf, 8.9 MB]

   ...pervasive that they affect the appearance of the Bay in its entirety: nevertheless this ‘gradient’ from more to less natural parts of the Bay remains clearly apparent. In a similar vein, the natural character values, and aesthetic cohesion and appeal, found throughout Matiatia Bay largely parallel this transition - from its mouth to its head. 12. For convenience, I reproduce below Attachment 1 to my original report, which I prepared to identify the inner and outer parts of t...

8. [2020] NZEnvC 009 Maypole Environmental Limited v Kapiti Coast District Council [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 9 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under cl 14 of the First Schedule to the Act MAYPOLE ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITED (ENV-2018-WLG-000008) Appellant KAPITI COAST DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge B P Dwyer Environment Commissioner D J Bunting at Wellington on 30 January 2020 Counsel/ Appearances: P Tan...

9. Shankar v Ahuja [2015] NZIACDT 36 (31 March 2015) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...provisions in the Immigration Act. He did so without giving proper advice and taking informed instructions on the matter, and Immigration New Zealand rejected the request. [2.9] The complainant could not work and suffered hardship while she successfully appealed to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal. [3] Mr Ahuja says the complainant’s account is untrue. He says he did receive instructions, but before he could lodge the application, the complainant removed papers from his office...

10. Waitangi Tribunal Hearing Calendar (28 February 2019) [pdf, 587 KB]

    ...Wai 863 – Pouakani hearing (Judge Wainwright), Wellington Wellington 11 12 13 Wai 21802 – Taihape (Judge Harvey), Hearing Week 10, Venue TBC Wai 814/Wai 14893 – Mangatū Remedies (Judge Milroy), Panel Hui 3, Wellington Appeal Court 14 Wai 2180 – Taihape (Judge Harvey), Hearing Week 10, Venue TBC Appeal Court 15 Wai 2180 – Taihape (Judge Harvey), Hearing Week 10, Venue TBC Appeal Court 16 Wai 2180 – Taihape (Judge Harvey), Hear...