Search Results

1. Scott - Paremata Mokau A7A1 (Mokau Marae) (2017) 155 Taitokerau MB 135 (155 TTK 135) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...stage two of the wharekai project. 38 The Proprietors of Mangakino Township v Māori Land Court CA65/99, 16 June 1999, Clarke v Karaitiana [2011] NZCA 154, Mikaere-Toto - Te Reti B and C Residue Trust [2014] Māori Appellate Court MB 249 (2014 APPEAL 249). 155 Taitokerau MB 154 meeting in 2015 where resolutions were passed that all existing trustees should stand down and new trustees should be elected. Nine people were elected five of whom are existing trustees. 39 The...

2. Foot v Registrar of the REAA [2015] NZREADT 24 [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...is essential that consumers are able to rely on the honesty and integrity of real estate agents and be protected from any form of dishonesty. 17 [84] Pursuant to s.113 of the Act, we record that any person affected by this decision may appeal against it to the High Court by virtue of s.116 of the Act. ______________________________ Judge P F Barber Chairperson ______________________________ Mr J Gaukrodger Member ______________________________...

3. [2015] NZEmpC 99 NZ Meat Workers Union Inc v South Pacific Meats Ltd [pdf, 249 KB]

   ...damage – not only to the applicant but also affected non-parties. Although an ability to challenge the refusal of a non- publication order at an interlocutory stage may disrupt unfinished Authority business, in the sense identified by the Court of Appeal in Rawlings, its distinguishing characteristic is that it is not the sort of determination that can subsequently be remedied on a challenge or by way of review. The horse will have well and truly bolted by that stage. [26] A refus...

4. 951650-Kainga-Ora-evidence-Phil-Jaggard-Stormwater-and-Flooding.pdf [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...infrastructure advice, support and expert evidence on water, wastewater and stormwater servicing for brownfield and greenfield development Projects for both public and private entities. The following experience is particularly relevant to this appeal: (a) Provided primary stormwater and flooding evidence on behalf of Kāinga Ora in relation to the Airport to Botany Rapid Transit Notices of Requirement (“NoRs”) applied for by Waka Kotahi and Auckland Transport (“AT”)....

5. MC & Ors v ND LCRO 377/2013 (13 October 2014) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...2 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008. 3 Above n 1 at [62]. 4 aspect of an inquiry by a Standards Committee and its determination. In Deliu v Hong 4 The power of review is much broader than an appeal. It gives the Review Officer discretion as to the approach to be taken on any particular review as to the extent of the investigations necessary to conduct that review, and therefore clearly contemplates the Review Officer reaching his or...

6. JSLB-BIM_Redacted-_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   ...administered across the following areas: • courts and tribunals • civil law • criminal justice and victims • constitutional • criminal law • occupational regulation • family Responsible for prosecuting the most serious crime, criminal appeals, and the oversight of public prosecutions. No legislation administered. Minister of Police: Responsible for the Police and the Serious Fraud Office. This includes oversight of the general conduct, functions, and duties of the...

7. Appendix-7_Julia-Williams_s87F-Report_Natural-Character_28-April-2023.pdf [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...the Ō2NL Project. Secondly, its approach to restore and rehabilitate the natural character of these areas where appropriate and practicable, seems wider than the GWRC’s objective to preserve and protect from inappropriate development. 2 Appeals Version 2022. Section 87F Report – Ōtaki to north of Levin Highway Project (Ō2NL Project) Prepared by Julia Williams – Natural Character 11 26. By definition, a large section of new roading infrastructure runn...

8. NU v ZY LCRO 239/2012 (31 March 2016) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...discretion, it is appropriate for the LCRO to exercise particular caution before substituting his own judgment for that of the Standards Committee, without good reason. [37] In Deliu v Hong it was noted that a review is:2 … much broader than an appeal. It gives the Review Officer discretion as to the approach to be taken on any particular review as to the extent of the investigations necessary to conduct that review, and therefore clearly contemplates the Review Officer reaching his...

9. {2017] NZEmpC 15 Spotless Facility Services NZ Ltd v Mackay [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...reference to the way in which they have been expressed before or even during the hearing. The section contemplates its use by the Tribunal of its own motion after the conclusion of the hearing if it is fair and just to do so. [44] The Court of Appeal considered this issue subsequently in New Zealand Van Lines Ltd v Gray when it had been argued by counsel that the Tribunal had erred in law in seeking submissions on the use of the power under s 34 and then using the...

10. Sexual-Violence-Bill-and-Govt-Response_FINAL.pdf [pdf, 1.7 MB]

    ...1961 to increase the maximum penalty available for the offence of sexual connection with a child from 14 years' to 20 years' imprisonment. (b) the jurisdiction of a court or tribunal (including rights to NO judicial review or rights of appeal)? 3.4.1. Was the Ministry of Justice consulted about these provisions? YES The Offence and Penalty Vetting team at the Ministry of Justice was consulted on this amendment. Privacy issues 3.5. Does this Bill create, amend or remove an...