Search Results

1. 4.-David-Dunlop-Traffic-and-Transport.pdf [pdf, 744 KB]

   ...respect of the NoRs: (i) Statement of evidence dated 8 March 2019;2 (ii) Joint Witness Statement of Transport and Social Experts dated 21 March 2019;3 (iii) Addendum evidence dated 25 March 2019;4 and 12. As part of the Environment Court appeals process in respect of the NoRs, I prepared a further addendum to my NoR Technical Assessment dated 21 August 2019,5 which assessed the proposed modification of one of the NoRs to provide for a more northerly alignment of the Project (...

2. Directory of Official Information A-C [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...Consent Authorities • Physical Sciences • Medical Testing • Metrology and Calibration • Radiology Services. Chairpersons of each PAC are members of the Accreditation Advisory Committee (AAC). The AAC and/or the Council may adjudicate any appeals arising from IANZ accreditations. Records Records are maintained on client registrations, assessments, reports and correspondences. A directory of IANZ accreditations is maintained and made available for public viewing on www.ian...

3. ENV-2016-CHC-000047 Blueskin Energy Limited v Dunedin City Council - Evidence - Stephen Chiles [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   CFH-309448-3-451-V2 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY ENV-2016-CHC-47 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Section 120 Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN BLUESKIN ENERGY LIMITED Appellant AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent BRIEF OF EVIDENCE OF DR STEPHEN GORDON CHILES ____________________________________________________________ GALLAWAY COOK ALLAN LAWYERS DUNEDIN Solicitor...

4. [2021] NZREADT 8 - Complaints Assessment Committee 2001 v Sheldon (19 February 2021) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...Tribunal will determine penalty on the papers, unless the parties advise the Tribunal that an oral hearing is sought. [70] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out the right of appeal to the High Court. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. _________________ Hon P J Andrews Chairperson ________________ Mr N O’Connor Member _________________...

5. [2024] NZEnvC 026 Nelson City Council [pdf, 515 KB]

   ...required to avoid absurdity or ambiguity. [77] However, ascertaining the plan meaning of a rule from the words itself cannot be undertaken in a vacuum (Powell v Dunedin City Council).20 A further useful consideration derives from an early Court of Appeal decision in Waimairi County 20 Powell v Dunedin City Council [2004] 3 NZLR 721. 18 Council v Hogan,21 namely: What would an ordinary reasonable member of the public, examining the scheme [the plan] have taken from the des...

6. [2021] NZEnvC 171 Public and Population Health Unit of the Northland District Health Board v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 546 KB]

   ...Health Unit of Northland District Health Board v Northland Regional Council (Topic 8 – Agrichemicals) IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 171 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under Clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND Topic 8 (Agrichemicals) of the Proposed Northland Regional Plan BETWEEN PUBLIC AND POPULATION HEALTH UNIT OF THE NORTHLAND DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD (...

7. BORA Aquaculture Reform Bill [pdf, 458 KB]

   ...or the allocation of, authorisations (clause 63(5)). 14. The assets received from the settlement are to be allocated to individual iwi. While the Bill does not define an iwi aquaculture organisation in overtly racial or ethnic terms, the Court of Appeal in Te Waka Hi Ika o Te Arawa v Treaty of Waitangi Fisheries Commission was unanimous in finding that the word “iwi” meant tribe or group of hapu and that a traditional tribe was a group of Māori people claiming descent from a common...

8. [2018] NZEmpC 37 Edminstin v Sanford Ltd [pdf, 396 KB]

   ...he was successful and is, therefore, entitled to an order in his favour. In supporting this claim, Mr Andrew’s submissions relied on the discretion to award costs in cl 19 of sch 3 of the Act and on the principles derived from three Court of Appeal decisions: Victoria University of Wellington v Alton- Lee,20 Binnie v Pacific Health Ltd,21 and Health Waikato v Elmsly.22 Initially, no submissions were made about the appropriateness, or reasonableness, of applying the Court’s Guid...

9. AVS Operating Guidelines for District Courts [pdf, 817 KB]

   ...appearing remotely. A judicial protocol has been developed to cover all sites and hearings in Appendix 1. 1.4 Authority to Use Section 103 of the Evidence Act 2006 allows for applications to be made to the court (the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal, the High Court, any District Court, Family Court or Youth Court) for witnesses to give evidence in an 3 alternative way. Alternative ways are outlined in section 105. Those which could be facilitated by AVS include a witne...

10. CAC 10031 v Lum-On [2012] NZREADT 30 [pdf, 144 KB]

    ...of this order. Mr Lum-On to file any submissions he wishes to make 10 days thereafter and the Complaints Assessment Committee to reply two days thereafter. [44] In accordance with s 113 of the Act the Tribunal advises the parties of the right to appeal this decision to the High Court pursuant to s 116 of the Act. DATED at WELLINGTON this 1st day of June 2012 ______________________________ Ms J Robson Member ______________________________ Mr G Denley Member...