Search Results

1. CAC 20004 v Campbell [2014] NZREADT 28 [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...clarify the merits of this complaint. [62] We confirm the finding we delivered after the hearing at Thames on 3 April 2014 that this charge is dismissed. [63] Pursuant to s.113 of the Act, we record that any person affected by this decision may appeal against it to the High Court by virtue of s.116 of the Act. ______________________________ Judge P F Barber Chairperson ______________________________ Mr J Gaukrodger Member __________________________...

2. [2024] NZEmpC 76 Al-Bustanji and Jenner v Corrections Association of New Zealand Inc  [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...the applicants had made their own complaint which was also being dealt with at the same time. [39] Possible sanctions under r 12 include: no further action, a warning, suspension for a period or expulsion from CANZ. Rule 12 contains a right to appeal which would be heard by two or more officers of the union. [40] On 17 April 2024, the solicitors for the applicants wrote to Mr du Plessis as president, raising concerns about his involvement in the meetings on 13 and 14 May 2023,...

3. Rophia v Tipene - Matua Porangahau No2B No 10 (2020) 86 Takitimu MB 84 (86 TKT 84) [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...was inappropriate for Mr Tipene-Matua to act contrary to the decision of a majority of trustees. The marae committee are only entitled to 4 Tatere v Te Aute Trust Board - Mangatainoka No 1BC No 2C [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 105 (2013 APPEAL 105) 5 Rameka v Hall [2013] NZCA 203 6 Robinson v Pett (1734) 3P WMS 249, (1734) 24 ER 1049; Bray v Ford [1896] AC 44; Boardman v Phipps [1966] 3 All ER 721; and Fenwick v Naera [2015] NZSC 68, [2016] 1 NZLR 354 at [70] – [73]...

4. Māori Land Court January 2022 - National Pānui [pdf, 302 KB]

   ...out-Application to the Chief Judge A20210014659 45/93 Deputy Registrar Angel Hati Moeau - To amend an order made at 25 RGTA 166-167 dated 11 March 2004-Application to the Chief Judge A20210014702 58/93 Rachel Witana Omapere Taraira E & Rangihamama X3A - Appeal against a decision made on 6 October 2021 at 238 Taitokerau MB 150 - Appeal A20210014714 45/93 Rose Tai Rakena MacLean Oakura A2C - and occupation orders made at 201 TTK 226 on 20 August 2019 - Application to the Chief Judge...

5. Gravatt v Bulmer (Strike-Out Application) [2014] NZHRRT 40 [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...these proceedings as Administrator of the Estate of Zachary Gravatt. [39] In the interests of brevity we note, without comment, that in Marks v Director of Health and Disability Proceedings [2009] NZCA 151, [2009] 3 NZLR 108 at [65] the Court of Appeal accepted that the term “aggrieved person” as used in s 51 extends to cover a deceased person’s executors or administrators. However the Court added a rider that there may be uncertainty as to whether proceedings can be taken under s...

6. [2019] NZEnvC 103 Beadle v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 4.6 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 103 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act PETER, JILLIAN AND SIMON BEADLE (ENV-2018-CHC-156) Appellants QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Hearing: In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Decision: 10 June 2019 Date of Issue: 10 June 2019 FINAL DECISION OF T...

7. CAC406 v Scheirlinck & Anor [2015] NZREADT 92 [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...4 CAC v Hume [2013] NZREADT 91. 5 REAA v Brankin [2013] NZREADT 32. 9 [26] For this reason we dismiss the charges against Mr Scheirlinck and Mr El- Ghalayini. [27] The Tribunal reminds parties of the appeal provisions in s 116 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. ______________________________ Ms K Davenport QC Chairperson ______________________________ Ms N Dangen Member ______________________________ Ms C Sand

8. 2023 NZPSPLA 036.pdf [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...unsuccessful he was stood down. [32] No evidence was provided to support this and the PSPLA had no contact from anyone on behalf of Security Guard B after 5 August 2021 attempting to have the decision declining his COA reversed. In addition, no appeal was filed against that decision. Security Guard B should not have been engaged until he obtained a COA and even if he was wrongfully engaged the continuation of his contract should have been conditional upon him obtaining a COA. When...

9. Joint Protocol Ministry of Justice and Department of Child, Youth and Family [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...Court that have been determined and where a genuine or proper interest has been established. (ii) Part 3 subpart 2 of the High Court Rules generally governs access to information concerning family related proceedings in the High Court and Court of Appeal that have been determined and where a genuine or proper interest has been established. (iii) Rule 8 of the Family Proceedings Rules governs access to information concerning proceedings under the Family Proceedings Act 1980 and Care of...

10. [2024] NZIACDT 03 – MT v Murthy (11 January 2024) [pdf, 160 KB]

    ...in Australia or his removal from Australia. He was subsequently issued with a work visa, having again failed to declare his criminal history. When Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ) found out, he was issued with a deportation order. An appeal to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal failed.1 He left New Zealand in 2015. [6] On 1 June 2021, the complainant and the client, together with Ms Murthy, signed the immigration company’s service contract. Ms Murthy agreed to se...