Search Results

1. LCRO 174/2018 GL v TE (18 June 2020) [pdf, 296 KB]

   ...scope of review [72] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:32 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...

2. [2018] NZEmpC 79 Hines v Eastland Port Ltd [pdf, 513 KB]

   ...acting upon an honest but mistaken belief is not misconduct (let alone serious misconduct). That submission overstates the position. As noted by this Court in Minhinnick v New Zealand Steel Ltd, the correct approach is that stated in the Court of Appeal in Chief Executive of the Department of Inland Revenue v Buchanan.12 That approach means that even one-off acts of inadvertence, oversight or negligence can, depending on the overall circumstances, amount to serious misconduct just...

3. MLC 2018 September 2018 - OCR Outstanding Applications [pdf, 382 KB]

   ...05/12/13 - Application to the Chief Judge A20180004454 58/93 Ngati Kawa Aramiha Taituha Te Tii A Maori Reservation (Waitangi Marae) - and an inquiry into administration of a rservation made at 173 Taitokerau MB 245 on 29 May 2018 - Appeal A20180004493 45/93 Ripeka Brightwell Roera Rangi or Rangi Roera or Roera Te Heke-tanga - and succession orders made at 10 Taranaki MB 174 (13/06/1904), 10 Taranaki MB 138 (12/10/1906) and Wellington Appellate MB no 1 p.133 (1...

4. LCRO 194/2017 MA v NB, OC and PD (20 September 2019) [pdf, 344 KB]

   ...scope of review [23] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:1 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...

5. LCRO 194/2020 WQ and QZ v [Company A] (29 March 2022) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...and scope of review The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:5 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

6. LCRO 42/2021 JKL Limited v HC and GD (30 August 2021) [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...scope of review [62] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:12 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. 12 Deliu v Hong [2012] NZHC 158, [2012] NZAR 209 at [39]–[41]. 13 The Review Officer has broad powers t...

7. LCRO 22/2019 HT v MK (29 May 2020) [pdf, 326 KB]

   ...scope of review [60] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:27 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for th...

8. ORC - Statement of Evidence - Felicity Boyd - 3 September 2021 [pdf, 3.3 MB]

   ...discussed further in paragraphs [84] to [98], [105] to [109] and [112] to [116] respectively. (c) At the time that PC8 was developed, Chapter 3 of the PORPS 2019 (which contained the primary freshwater and land management provisions) was under appeal and had not been made operative. Chapters 5 (Land) and 6 (Water) of the Regional Policy Statement for Otago 1998 (RPS 1998) were therefore still operative and had to be given effect to. In March 2021, most of the PORPS 2019 was made...

9. Beniston v Subritzky - Estate of Huhana Subritzky [2016] Chief Judge's MB 178 (2016 CJ 178) [pdf, 366 KB]

   ...in law because of any mistake or omission on the part of the Court or the 13 Muraahi v Phillips – Rangitoto Tuhua 55B1B and 55B1A2 (Manu Ariki Marae) [2013] Māori Appellate Court MB 528 (2013 APPEAL 528). 2016 Chief Judge’s MB 198 Registrar or in the presentation of the facts of the case to the Court or the Registrar, cancel or amend the order or certificate of confirmation or make such other order or issue such certifi...

10. Proactive release - Budapest Convention on Cybercrime [pdf, 1.2 MB]

    ...Customs, the Ministry of Primary Industries and Inland Revenue. 7 9(2)(f)(iv) Proa cti ve ly Rele as ed RESTRICTED 460mj2mvm3 2021-01-22 09:40:52 more than one year’s imprisonment for an individual). Orders would be able to be appealed to the district court (on any aspect of the order). 51 Preservation orders would also require the recipient to disclose a limited amount of traffic data to Police, to address circumstances where multiple service providers4 were...