Search Results

1. LCRO 196/2016 GY v SO (15 September 2017) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...scope of review [24] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:22 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

2. Baker v Baker - Tarawera 5A (2012) 18 Takitimu MB 262 (18 TKT 262) [pdf, 137 KB]

   ...6 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act, s 17(2)(a). 18 Tākitimu MB 272 Jurisdiction under s 18(1)(i) [17] The issue of what jurisdiction is granted by s 18(1)(i) was discussed by the Court of Appeal in Attorney-General v Māori Land Court [1999] 1 NZLR 689. This case involved General and Crown land, and the ability of the Māori Land Court to make vesting orders in relation to such land. The Court of Appeal stated that:7 There is

3. KY v DZ LCRO 174/2015 (25 October 2016) [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...the LCRO on review [41] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:4 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for t...

4. Pouwhare v Auld - Oparau No 1 Block and Pirongia West 12B3D (2015) 95 Waikato Maniapoto MB 167 (95 WMN 167) [pdf, 270 KB]

   ...jurisdiction, what costs if any, should be awarded in favour of the respondent? The jurisdiction argument [12] The applicants submit that Judge Milroy did not make any orders in respect of costs, nor were costs reserved. The respondent did not appeal that decision and it should be treated as final. [13] The applicants further submit that had Judge Milroy intended that costs would be addressed at the time any order for compensation was finalised, her judgment would have provided...

5. LCRO 18/2020 MP v LT (31 August 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...scope of review [32] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:3 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...

6. LCRO 165/2019 RG v TQ (19 May 2021) [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...scope of review [28] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:1 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...

7. [2021] NZEnvC 066 Auckland Council v Waiwera Heights Country Club Limited [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMA.KI MAKAURAU Court: Hearing: IN THE I\1ATTER OF AND BETWEEN AND Decision [2021] NZEnvC 066 an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 an application for amendment of an enforcement order WAI\VERA HEIGHTS COUNTRY CLUB LIMITED (ENV-2021-AKL-024) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Judge J A Smith (Chair) Commissioner S K Prime 13 May 2021 Last case event: Draft Enforcem...

8. Churton v Trustees of the Mangaporou Trust (2015) 337 Aotea MB 131 (337 AOT 131) [pdf, 219 KB]

   ...annual grazing agreement since the 1980s over Pukehika block, which was part of the trust’s corpus. That grazing 5 Keepa v Vercoe – Ruatoki B92 [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 189 (2015 APPEAL 189) at [13] 6 Churton v Trustees of Mangaporou Trust (2002) 122 Aotea MB 182 (122 AOT 182), Churton v Trustees of Mangaporou Trust (2003) 132 Aotea MB 219 (132 AOT 219), Churton v Mangaporou Trust - Mangaporou Trust (2003) 15 Aotea...

9. LCRO 189/2016 EM v FN and GP (19 May 2017) [pdf, 158 KB]

   ...scope of review [41] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:1 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

10. LCRO 90/2016 FL v WZ (15 August 2019) [pdf, 196 KB]

    ...scope of review [21] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:1 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for tha...