Search Results

1. [2008] NZEmpC WC 11/08 McCain Foods (NZ) Ltd v Service and Food Workers Union [pdf, 86 KB]

   MCCAIN FOODS (NZ) LTD V SFWU WN WC 11/08 23 June 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 11/08 WRC 41/07 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MCCAIN FOODS (NZ) LIMITED Plaintiff AND SERVICE & FOOD WORKERS UNION NGA RINGA TOTA INCORPORATED Defendant Hearing: 28 April 2008 (Heard at Auckland) Court: Chief Judge G L Colgan Judge B S Travis Judge A A Couch Appearances: RL Towner, Counsel for Pl

2. [2009] NZEmpC AC 49/09 Norske Skog Tasman Ltd v Manufacturing and Construction Workers Union & Anor [pdf, 135 KB]

   NORSKE SKOG TASMAN LTD V MANUFACTURING & CONSTRUCTION WORKERS UNION & ANOR AK AC 49/09 9 December 2009 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 49/09 ARC 71/08 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NORSKE SKOG TASMAN LIMITED Plaintiff AND MANUFACTURING & CONSTRUCTION WORKERS UNION INC First Defendant AND BRIAN BOYLEN Second Defendant Hearing: 28 May 2009 (Heard at Auckland) with addit

3. [2021] NZEmpC 149 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre [pdf, 211 KB]

   A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT v SAMRA HOLDINGS LIMITED T/A TE PUNA LIQUOR CENTRE [2021] NZEmpC 149 [10 September 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 149 EMPC 87/2020 EMPC 365/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for the exercise of powers under sections 142B, 142E, 142J, 142M, 142W and 142X of the Employment Relations Act 2000...

4. [2022] NZEmpC 234 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre [pdf, 685 KB]

   A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT v SAMRA HOLDINGS LIMITED T/A TE PUNA LIQUOR CENTRE [2022] NZEmpC 234 [15 December 2022] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 234 EMPC 87/2020 EMPC 365/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for the exercise of powers under sections 142B, 142E, 142J, 142M, 142W and 142X of the Employment Relations Act 2000...

5. [2023] NZEmpC 89 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Prisha’s Hospitality (2017) Ltd T/A Royal Cambridge Indian Restaurant [pdf, 787 KB]

   A LABOUR INSPECTOR OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT v PRISHA’S HOSPITALITY (2017) LIMITED TRADING AS ROYAL CAMBRIDGE INDIAN RESTAURANT [2023] NZEmpC 89 [16 June 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 89 EMPC 450/2019 IN THE MATTER OF minimum employment standards – applications for exercise of powers under Part 9A of the Employment Relations Act 200...

6. EMPC Practical guide to litigating in the Employment Court [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...same, similar or related issues; in all the circumstances the case should be removed. 6 Section 178(3). The application must be in form 3. 7 See Practice Direction: Freezing and Search Orders, Chief Judge Colgan, April 2012. 8 H v A Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 92. 3 Consider alternatives – such as whether action in the District Court to enforce orders made in the Authority may be preferable to compliance proceedings in the Court. 9 Pleadings and timeframes The Employmen...

7. Manahi v The Māori Trustee – Kapenga A5 (2018) 184 Waiariki MB 168 (184 WAR 168-180) [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...result, the Court must decline a recall for the purpose of seeking orders under those sections. In reliance on Henderson v Henderson counsel says that the 10 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [2013] NZEmpC 91 at [7]. 184 Waiariki MB 177 Court would have to disallow any new arguments if it recalled the application therefore making it futile for the Court to grant the recall application.11 [42] In summary, Mr Bidois submits tha...

8. LCRO 9/2024 & 12/2024 QB v WF and SY & WF and SY v QB (27 June 2024) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...professional conduct. The former is essentially a compensatory process premised on rules of evidence and reasonably strict principles of causation 14 GFW Agri-Products Ltd v Gibson [1995] 2 ERNZ 323 (CA). 15 Farmer Motor Group Ltd v McKenzie [2017] NZEmpC 98. 16 Ioan v Scott Technology NZ Ltd [2019] NZCA 386. 27 and measure of loss. The latter is a disciplinary process to fulfil the statutory purposes of maintaining confidence in the provision of legal services, protecting consu...

9. Hammond v Credit Union Baywide [2015] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...straightforward process. The facts do not call for observations to be made about the application of those principles in the context of social networking sites. Contrast Senior v Police [2013] NZFLR 356 (HC) and Hook v Stream Group (NZ) Pty Ltd [2013] NZEmpC 188 at [29] to [37]. A further point to be made is that the manner in which the case has been framed by the parties has made it unnecessary for the Tribunal to consider the possible application of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act...