• If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg, conduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
  • If you want to search for a specific section of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 or rule in the Professional Rules 2012, you must search it as one word with no spaces or brackets. For example, if searching for section 110A(2)(a) of the Act, you should enter ‘s110A2a’ into the keyword search and if searching for rule 6.4 of the Professional Rules, you should enter ‘r6.4’.

If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, Real Estate Agents Disciplinary Tribunal).

Search results

877 items matching your search terms

  1. [2025] NZREADT 08 - OQ v Knowles & Maclean (21 March 2025) [PDF, 327 KB]

    Compensation referral / Committee found licensee one failed to ensure property was sold as a going concern and include vendor’s GST registration in sale and purchase agreement (ASP) and licensee two failed to supervise / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s110, s1105 / Professional Rules 2012, r5.1, r5.2, r8.3, r8.4, r9.8, r9.9 / KD v Donaldson [2023] NZREADT 12 / HELD / first compensation referral decision / Tribunal may have regard to principles from its compensation jurisdiction under s1102g / must apply, and must not overturn, Committee’s determination of any substantive matter in the case / no jurisdiction to award interest under Interest on Money Claims Act 2016 / satisfied loss caused by licensee’s unsatisfactory conduct / commission repayment by licensee should be taken into account as it offset vendor’s losses / 15 per cent reduction for vendor’s failure to mitigate loss by signing ASP  and not seeking legal advice / licensees ordered to pay $35,1011.65

  2. [2025] NZREADT 7 Hi & FT v CAC 2205 (3 March 2025) [PDF, 224 KB]

    Appeal / purchasers of residential property later discovered building work was previously undertaken without CCCs being obtained / purchasers complained about licensee’s alleged lack of disclosure / Registrar took no further action due to lack of evidence that licensee failed to disclose absence of CCCs / Real Estate Agents 2008, s111 / HELD / not in dispute that at time of purchase there were no CCCs for two building consents including original dwelling / mutually agreed that licensee sent LIM report to purchasers prior to auction / however, purchaser contended licensee did not disclose absence of CCCs / licensee contended absence of CCCs verbally disclosed during inspection / Tribunal noted unreliability of purchaser and licensee’s memories given effluxion of time / on balance, purchasers failed to discharge burden of proving factual basis of complaint / appeal dismissed / Registrar’s decision to take no further action confirmed

  3. [2025] NZREADT 06 - UX v REAA (19 February 2025) [PDF, 292 KB]

    Interlocutory application for full disclosure of confidential information / unsuccessful tenderer alleged licensees’ tender process was not transparent, did not reasonably explain shift in tender date, had unreasonable time constraints, and lacked proper communication with tenderer’s agent / Registrar relied on information not fully disclosed to complainant in determining not to pursue complaint, concluding it disclosed inconsequential matters / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s743a, s105, s109, s112 / HELD / Tribunal considered unredacted documents to determine appropriateness of disclosure / failure to disclosure “secret” information prima facie breach of natural justice / however, complainant was provided sufficient description of documents to answer licensees’ defence / redactions appropriate in light of privacy interests / Registrar should have advised complainant its possession of confidential information but failure to do so not error of law / redacted information of insufficient p…

  4. [2025] NZREADT 03 - XS v REAA (10 February 2025) [PDF, 295 KB]

    Application to review Registrar’s determination not to pursue complaint as it only disclosed inconsequential matters / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s74, s107A, s112 / Professional Conduct and Client Care Rules 2012, r5.1 and r6.4 / HELD / purchaser alleged licensee enticed consideration of property with lower price than in fact sought / Registrar overlooked licensee’s admission as to communicated price expectation / nonetheless, Registrar’s conclusion that licensee did not give incorrect or misleading advice justified / purchaser not misled as to price at critical time of making offer / purchaser also disputed licensee’s statements regarding leak / licensee assured purchaser that leak was historic / Registrar failed to consider evidence of licensee’s knowledge of ongoing leak and failure to disclose until after settlement / purchaser further alleged licensee unduly pressured her into purchase / frequency of phone communications reasonable / Registrar correct to find no evidence of undu…

  5. [2025] NZREADT 01 LQ v Registrar Substantive (9 January 2025) [PDF, 250 KB]

    Appeal / licensee conducted two visits to complainant tenant’s property / complainant alleged that licensee failed to attend one arranged outside-only viewing and later forcibly entered property without consent / Registrar took no further action / Real Estate Agents 2008, s743a and s111 / Professional Rules 2012 / HELD / evidence supported conclusion that second visit had been agreed upon and was not rescheduling of missed appointment / in any event, a licensee’s forgetfulness resulting in a missed appointment could not justify disciplinary response / no evidence that licensee misled complainant as to scope of two arrangements / only independent evidence supported licensee’s assertion of consented entry / appeal dismissed / Registrar’s decision to take no further action confirmed

  6. [2024] NZREADT 48 – CAC2105 v Chen, Stevenson & Buy West Realty (18 December 2024) [PDF, 565 KB]

    Liability / misconduct and incompetent or seriously negligent real estate work charges against licensee, managing director and agency arising from imbalances in VPA account balances / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s3, s50, s72, s73b, s73c, s s85, s86, s110 / Professional Rules 2012, r5.1, r6.1, r6.3, r8.3, r8.4, r9.13 and r10.6c / HELD / licensee’s practice of ticking “no refund” without confirmation reckless / licensee liable for reckless contravention per s73b / director and agency did not have appropriate checks and balances to control VPA funds / numerous failings seen as systemic failure to reconcile VPA / properly characterised as negligence / director and agency liable per s73b / license failed to adequately particularise marketing and advertising costs / unsatisfactory conduct per s72a / director and agency’s failure to supervise licensee’s handling of VPA inadequate / director and agency liable for misconduct per s73b / penalty decision to follow

  7. [2024] NZREADT 47 – Andrews & Grant v CAC 2205 & Ors (9 December 2024) [PDF, 198 KB]

    Appeal / licensees advertised cottage as having electricity connection linked to main house / following settlement, purchasers were required to pay for installation of separate connection / Committee found licensees’ misrepresentation, albeit made innocently, amounted to unsatisfactory conduct / Real Estate Agents 2008, s111 / Professional Rules 2012, r5.4 and r6.4 / Tribunal directed licensees to apply for leave to produce fresh evidence / fresh evidence not considered in absence of such application / in any event, licensees’ submissions supported Committee’s determination that licensees had misrepresented there was a separate electricity connection / appeal dismissed / Committee’s finding of unsatisfactory conduct confirmed

  8. [2024] NZREADT 46 - JX v CAC2201 Baker (22 November 2024) [PDF, 221 KB]

    Penalty / licensee misled purchaser as to status of builder and existence of transferable guarantee / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s3, s50, s93, s108, s1104, s1115 / Professional Rules 2012, r6.4 / licensee’s misrepresentation was careless but unintentional / breach of Rules occurred more than 10 years ago / licensee was novice agent at time of misrepresentation and not subject to disciplinary complaints in intervening years / no need for personal deterrence against repetition / disciplinary orders not warranted / no clear claim for compensation from purchaser / reference to significant legal costs allegedly incurred by purchaser not supported by breakdown of costs or documentary evidence / causative link between misrepresentation and loss unproven / no penalty orders imposed / passage of time since unsatisfactory conduct insufficient to displace presumption of publication of licensee’s identity in interests of transparency

  9. [2024] NZREADT 45 – Parmar v REAA, KB & LB (20 November 2024) [PDF, 121 KB]

    Appeal / licensee provided purchaser with key to property prior to settlement without vendor’s permission / Committee found licensee guilty of unsatisfactory conduct / Committee ordered censure, $1,500 fine and refund of commission to sum of $3,000 / licensee appealed against penalty / Real Estates Agents Act 2008, s3, s4, s892b, s93 and s111 / Professional Rules 2012, r5.1, r9.1 and r9.5 / Tribunal admitted licensee’s fresh evidence of commission statement / evidence relevant, cogent and credible / Committee did not refer to any evidential foundation when fixing sum of compensatory order at $3,000 / interests of natural justice supported admission of evidence / commission refund should identify and relate to particular aspect of work relating to disciplinary findings / unsatisfactory conduct did not pertain to entire range of work provided / Committee’s refund sum excessive / $1,500 refund and $1,500 fine appropriate / Committee’s decision modified / appeal partially upheld

  10. [2024] NZREADT 44 - Lemalu v CAC 2205 & KE (8 November 2024) [PDF, 253 KB]

    Appeal / licensee failed to disclose removal of gate and shower glass wall in sale agreement and during final inspection / Committee found licensee guilty of unsatisfactory conduct and ordered replacement of gate and shower / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s931f, s111 / Professional Rules 2012, r5.1, r6.2, r6.4 / HELD / licensee incorrectly applied “legalistic lens” to vendors’ query concerning removal of gate / should in fairness have disclosed to purchaser, irrespective of whether chattel or fixture, and despite intention to redevelop property / incorrectly advised vendors shower wall could be removed / no evidence of purchaser’s consent to shower wall removal / breaches of r5.1, r6.2 and r9.1 / properly assessed as low to middle gravity of offending / Committee lacked jurisdiction to order relief as consequences of licensee’s errors were no longer operative following demolition / Committee’s modified / liability decision and training order upheld / relief orders vacated

  11. [2024] NZREADT 43 - TL v CAC 2204 LS Ray White (5 November 2024) [PDF, 300 KB]

    Appeal / complaint licensee and agency mismanaged conflict of interest and agency failed to appropriately supervise licensee / licensee’s family member purchased property / Committee found licensee and agency guilty of unsatisfactory conduct for failure to follow s134 / fined agency $9,000 and published its name / vendor appealed against penalty / Real Estates Agents Act 2008, s3, s4, s72, s73, s93, s111, s134, s136 / Professional Rules 2012, r6.4 / HELD / Tribunal clarified Committee’s liability findings / found Committee erred in failing to consider refund under s134 / complainants in disciplinary proceedings need not commence civil proceedings to recover under s134 / nexus required between subject of upheld complaint and refund / s134 does not require licensee to act under agency agreement nor any loss to vendor / refund punitive, not compensatory / licensee and agency ordered to refund commission shares / Committee’s decision modified / appeal partially upheld   

  12. [2024] NZREADT 42 - KD v CAC 2204 & XZ (31 October 2024) [PDF, 197 KB]

    Appeal / complaint licensee failed to deduct GST from price of chattels included with property resulting in purchaser paying too much / Committee took no further action / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s111 / Professional Rules 2012, r5.1, r5.2 / HELD /  Tribunal disagreed with Committee’s assessment that fundamental level of GST knowledge required expertise beyond what could be expected of licensee / licensee required to have basic understanding of GST or prompt purchaser to obtain professional advice / potential oversight from licensee / however, purchaser received legal advice and continued with transaction notwithstanding GST error which licensee declined to correct / purchaser waited more than four years to make complaint / delay in bringing complaint does not extinguish rights but is adverse factor / purchaser’s decision to continue with transaction notwithstanding error fatal to complaint / Committee’s decision confirmed / appeal dismissed

  13. [2024] NZREADT 41 – CAC 2103 v Jones Lang Laselle Ltd (29 October 2024) [PDF, 253 KB]

    Liability and penalty / real estate agency pleaded guilty to amended charge of unsatisfactory conduct for non-compliance with Audit Regulations over one year period / failure to appoint auditor, notify Authority of trust account transactions, provide monthly balances, and prepare statement or statutory declaration / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s72, s110 / Real Estate Agents (Audit) Regulations 2009, reg9, reg15, reg16 / HELD / Tribunal emphasised importance of trust account compliance for public protection / amount of monies transferred in and out of trust account were at times significant / accepted that breaches occurred inadvertently due to miscommunication and change in auditors / agency admitted liability and cooperated with Authority / no prior disciplinary history / company implemented changes to ensure future compliance / low to mid-level penalty appropriate / Tribunal ordered censure, required company officer to undergo training and imposed $5,000 fine

  14. [2024] NZREADT 40 - CAC v Tafilipepe (25 October 2024) [PDF, 367 KB]

    Liability and penalty / misconduct / licensee pleaded guilty to disgraceful conduct for non-compliance with Audit Regulations over period of nearly two years / failure to appoint auditor, notify Authority of trust account transactions, provide monthly balances, prepare statement or statutory declaration, and maintain adequate records / drew upon monies to pay personal and business expenses / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s73a, s110, s1102f, s122, s123, s125, / Real Estate Agents (Audit) Regulations 2009, reg5, reg6, reg7, reg8, reg9, reg14, reg15 / HELD / trust account compliance necessary for public protection / deliberate and intentional breaches / personally benefitted from trust monies despite no loss to any client / discrepancies between trust monies required and those held often significant / aggravated by disciplinary history / serious wrongdoing / public interest favoured publication / Tribunal ordered censure, $16,784.17 in costs, and 5 year prohibition from real estate work

  15. [2024] NZREADT 39 – Chen v REAA (22 October 2024) [PDF, 183 KB]

    Application to review Registrar’s determination / Registrar cancelled licence as licensee failed to complete required continuing education / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s54d, s55, s112 / Real Estate Agents (Continuing Professional Development Rules) Notice 2018 / HELD / did not complete CPD by deadline / Registrar correctly followed statutory process / Registrar must cancel licence as required by s54d / Registrar has no discretion to consider health or financial circumstances / no application for deferral or exemption made / licensees are responsible for ensuring they receive correspondence from Registrar / no error of fact or law / application dismissed / Registrar’s decision confirmed

  16. [2024] NZREADT 38 – TX v REAA (22 October 2024) [PDF, 161 KB]

    Application to review Registrar’s determination not to pursue complaint as it only disclosed inconsequential matters / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s72, s73, s74, s112 / HELD / licensee’s property management was not real estate agency work and therefore could not be assessed as unsatisfactory conduct, only misconduct / misconduct requires conduct reasonably regarded by agents of good standing or reasonable members of the public as disgraceful / licensee’s communications to complainant were direct and could be perceived as abrupt and rude, but behaviour not “disgraceful” / communications relating to rent relief viewed in context of longstanding dispute as to alleged rent arrears which licensee and colleagues sought to resolve / no evidence of threatening behaviour / application dismissed / Registrar’s decision confirmed

  17. [2024] NZREADT 37 – QT v CAC 2205 & TP (3 October 2024) [PDF, 250 KB]

    Appeal / licensee advertised property as having “home automation” /  purchasers alleged that licensee had misrepresented that property featured a Control4 automation system / Committee took no further action / Real Estate Agents 2008, s111 / Professional Rules 2012, r6.4 / HELD / licensee provided base package material specifications which did not reference Control4 / purchasers made no queries about whether Control4 included and had obtained legal advice on sale and purchase agreement / purchaser had purchased base package with central hub wiring for smart home system / not proven that the licensee failed to accurately represent what was included in property’s home automation system / vendor’s evidence corroborated licensee’s evidence / appeal dismissed / Committee’s decision to take no further action confirmed

  18. [2024] NZREADT 35 – CAC 2108 v Barfoot Thompson (20 September 2024) [PDF, 143 KB]

    Liability and penalty / real estate agency pleaded guilty to unsatisfactory conduct for its failure to appropriately supervise new agent / agent failed to read building report and identify potential weathertightness issues / agent did not bring report to attention of potential purchasers but recommended independent building report / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s3, s50, s72b, s93, s110, s1102f / Professional Rules 2012, r8.3 / HELD / Tribunal satisfied agency’s conduct amounted to unsatisfactory conduct / no evidence of pattern of unsatisfactory conduct amongst inexperienced salespeople at agency / unsatisfactory conduct most likely arose from agent’s misunderstanding as to supervisory structure / agency has since taken steps to revise supervision policies to ensure situation not repeated / no previous disciplinary record / agency cooperated with disciplinary processes / Tribunal ordered censure and imposed $7,500 fine

  19. [2024] NZREADT 34 – MY v CAC 2301 & MA (19 September 2024) [PDF, 143 KB]

    Appeal / licensee facilitated sale following relationship property division agreement / property owner alleged that licensee enabled unauthorised entry of valuer into property, accepted ex-husband’s instructions without agreement, and improperly changed duration of agency agreement / Committee took no further action / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s111 / Professional Rules 2012, r5.1, r6.1, r6.2, r6.4, r9.1 / HELD / no evidence of wrongdoing by licensee in allowing valuer to enter house / owner was informed prior to visit and did not object / owner did not inform licensee to deal only with her or correct understanding that ex-husband was fully active participant / however, licensee wrong to alter duration of signed agency contract without owner’s consent / breach of r5.1, r6.2 and r9.1 / licensee acted on another beneficial owner’s instructions and immediately took steps to rectify / threshold for disciplinary response not met / Committee’s decision confirmed / appeal dismissed

  20. [2024] NZREADT 33 – Wilson v REAA (15 September 2024) [PDF, 105 KB]

    Application to review Registrar’s determination / Registrar cancelled licence as licensee failed to complete required continuing education / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s54d, s55, s112 / Real Estate Agents (Continuing Professional Development Rules) Notice 2018 / HELD / did not complete CPD by deadline / Registrar correctly followed statutory process / Registrar must cancel licence as required by s54d / licensees are responsible for ensuring they receive correspondence from Registrar / no error of fact or law / application dismissed, Registrar’s decision confirmed   

  21. [2024] NZREADT 32 – JX v CAC2201 & Baker (13 September 2024) [PDF, 265 KB]

    Appeal / complaint that licensee failed to disclose defective and non-consented work & misrepresented multi-offer situation / complaint licensee misled purchaser as to status of builder and existence of transferable guarantee / Committee took no further action / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s111 / Professional Rules 2012, r5.1, r6.2, r6.4, r10.7 / HELD / no evidence licensee withheld building report, was aware of defects or unauthorised building works, misled purchaser about multi-offer situation, or improperly responded to purchaser’s legal claims / extent of defects not evidence of licensee’s knowledge / licensee entitled to rely on council certification and engaged building professionals / finding that licensee made significant albeit innocent misrepresentation about builder’s status and building work having transferrable master builder guarantee / finding of unsatisfactory conduct warranted / Committee’s decision modified to reflect adverse findings / decision otherwise confirmed

  22. [2024] NZREADT 31 - HH v CAC 2201 SL (12 September 2024) [PDF, 261 KB]

    Appeal / complaint that licensee placed unauthorised bid at auction and misrepresented bid to induce further bid / licensee disclosed identity of other bidder to purchaser / Committee took no further action / Real Estates Agents Act 2008, s3, s4, s111 / Privacy Act 2020 / Professional Rules 2012, r5.1, r6.2, r6.4 / HELD / purchaser did not establish that licensee made bid without instruction or falsely informed purchaser that bid was made by other known bidder / purchaser’s evidence as to bidding instructions contradicted bidding history at auction / suggestion that licensee misled purchaser as to leading bid implausible / purchaser may have forgotten or become confused as to instructions / licensee breached bidder’s privacy by disclosing identity and bidding number / breach of r5.1 and r6.2 but no disciplinary response required due to agency’s (barely adequate) corrective actions / threshold for unsatisfactory conduct not met / appeal dismissed / Committee’s decision confirmed

  23. [2024] NZREADT 30 - Bhatt v Registrar of the REAA (9 September 2024) [PDF, 213 KB]

    Application to review Registrar’s determination / Registrar cancelled licence as licensee failed to pay annual fee for keeping licence suspended / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s54h, s55, s112 / HELD / licensee does not dispute he failed to pay annual suspension fee but submits he did not receive reminder communications / Tribunal accepts Registrar followed correct process / licensees are responsible for updating their contact details / Registrar must cancel licence as required by s54h / no error of fact or law / application dismissed, Registrar’s decision confirmed

  24. [2024] NZREADT 29 - CS v REAA (3 September 2024) [PDF, 256 KB]

    Application to review Registrar’s determination not to pursue complaint as it only disclosed inconsequential matters / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s74, s112 / HELD / second complaint / Registrar’s decision on first complaint was not reviewed / Tribunal’s task is to determine whether Registrar appropriately exercised discretion under s74 / no evidence supporting allegations against licensee / not shown that Registrar’s findings were wrong / application dismissed / Registrar’s decision confirmed

  25. [2024] NZREADT 28 – CT v CAC 2106 & Ors (27 August 2024) [PDF, 179 KB]

    Appeal / complaint that licensees failed to fully disclose information relating to property’s weathertightness and defects / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s111, s 133 / Professional Rules 2012, r5.1, r9.3 / HELD / no breach of r9.3 / vendor’s evidence of knowledge of initial inspections incorrect / initial inspections’ recommendation to engage further expert not passed on, but immaterial as expert engaged per licensees’ advice / internal disclosures form updated and not passed on to vendors, but immaterial as vendors knew new information / breaches of r5.1 (and s133), but no disciplinary action warranted / expert not advised of initial findings, but identified same issues / offer presentation not signed in accordance with s133 but remedied quickly and purchaser was a licensee familiar with guide / Tribunal observed licensees in a team can be individually responsible for same failures / Committee’s decision reversed / appeal allowed