You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
For related District Court decisions refer to the District Court website.
381 items matching your search terms
CIPU complaint upheld - finding of misconduct - operating a security company without a company license - employing non-COA holders - providing security services without a COA - reprimanded - COA subject to conditions - ss 23, 44, 45, 74, 75, 81, 83, 96C of the Act
Police v Tukula - Conviction of wounding with intent to do GBH and 3-year prison sentence are grounds for disqualification and a mandatory ground for cancellation - COA cancelled - s 62 & 82
Caption: Police v Taufa – Not wearing ID is a breach of s 67 and misconduct – reprimand and warning.
Rooney Complaint – Working in security while COA suspended – running a security business without a licence & giving false information to the Authority and CIPU – Misconduct – COA cancelled. SS 4, 23, 44 & 105 of the PSPPI Act
S.E.A.L Security and Kumar Penalty decision – Reprimand, $1,000 fine and condition place on licence prohibiting further recruitment of migrant workers.
Complaint re S.E.A.L Security and Kumar – Running an unlicenced security business, not adequately investigating claims of migrant exploitation and not provided required for migrant workers is misconduct – applying for incorrect immigration accreditation is unsatisfactory conduct – complaint of employing guards without COAs and other migrant exploitation not established – ss 4,23, 45 PSPPI Act.
Police v Falwasser – Disqualifying conviction – multiple family harm incidents – COA cancelled.
Marlborough Security Ltd complaint – failure to keep records, file annual returns and engaging security guards without COAs is misconduct – Breaches rectified and new systems in place – Final warning issued.
CIPU Investigation into company licence holder – Contravention of s 45(1) by engaging security workers without COAs is misconduct – providing misleading information in support of an employees application for a COA is unsatisfactory conduct – fine and reprimand.
Police v Takitaki – disqualifying drug and firearms offences – mandatory grounds for disqualification - COA cancelled.
Police v Dellaway – disqualifying conviction under s 62(f)(vi) – mandatory ground for cancellation – COA cancelled and company licence suspended under s43(6) for failing to file annual returns
Police v Goulton – complaint after disqualifying convictions – COA cancelled
Objection upheld - COA declined - gang affiliation - ss46,49,53 of the Act
Police v Kerr complaint – disqualifying convictions, swearing at police, and using gang signals while working in security – COA cancelled.
Police v Hape – Prospect for the Mongrel Mob – No longer suitable to be a security guard – COA cancelled.
Police v Rata complaint - failing to address warrant for outstanding fines - COA suspended with ability to have it reinstated on cancellation of the warrant.
Police complaint upheld - misconduct - excessive force and stomping - COA cancelled - ss 4, 62, 74, 82, 83, 96C of the Act
Police v Vunileva - complaint based on disqualifying conviction with further charges pending - COA cancelled.
Police v Tupouniua complaint - working with a suspended COA is misconduct, hostility and uncooperative attitude to police & subject to an outstanding fines warrant - misconduct and unsatisfactory conduct - COA cancelled with conditions to meet to obtain a new COA.
Police v Pilitati complaint - recent disqualifying convictions under s 62(f)(v) - mandatory ground for disqualification - COA cancelled s 82.
Police v Brunt - 4 convictions for offences of violence - mandatory grounds for disqualification - COA cancelled.
Police v Mumby - breach of s67 and subject to a fines warrant - misconduct established - Suspension of COA until warrant cancelled and undertaking provided.
Police v Singh Maan - Objection to application for a COA on character grounds recurring incidents of threatening and violent behavior - COA declined.
Police v Robertson - No longer suitable to be a CAO holder due to anger issues and violent behavior - reprimanded and conditions placed on COA.
Police complaint of no longer suitable to be a COA holder under s 83(ab) - requires more than a one-off event-threatening manager is misconduct - losing job is sufficient penalty.