You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Helpful search tips:

• If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
• If you are doing a keyword search (eg. misconduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
• If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, LCRO misconduct).

Jurisdiction All Taxation and Charities Review Authority Accident Compensation Appeals District Court Registry Customs Appeal Authority Secondhand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Tenancy Tribunal Land Valuation Tribunal Employment Court Environment Court Coroners Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Māori Land Court Māori Appellate Court Disputes Tribunal Accident Compensation Appeal Authority Copyright Tribunal Human Rights Review Tribunal Immigration Advisers Complaints & Disciplinary Tribunal Lawyers & Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal Private Security Personnel Licensing Authority Licensing Authority of Secondhand Dealers & Pawnbrokers Legal Complaints Review Officer Real Estate Agents Disciplinary Tribunal Review Authority Social Security Appeal Authority Student Allowance Appeal Authority Victims' Special Claims Tribunal Waitangi Tribunal Weathertight Homes Tribunal

Search by keywords

Release date if known Select a year 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964

Select a month January February March April May June July August September October November December

Select a day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

1. Sandy v Khan LCRO 181 / 2009 (25 December 2009) - Decision on orders [PDF, 112 KB]

   It is unacceptable for a single firm to act for two parties who are in dispute with each other

2. Stroud v Gateshead LCRO 205 / 2009 (24 December 2009) [PDF, 41 KB]

   Jurisdiction of LCRO to consider review when application form and / or fee received outside 30 working days 

3. Yaxley v Falkirk LCRO 184 / 2009 (23 December 2009) [PDF, 57 KB]

   Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed

4. Rattray v Denbigh LCRO 211 / 2009 (16 December 2009) [PDF, 42 KB]

   The LCRO's powers do not extend to the discretion of whether there is jurisdiction to hear a review, these guidelines are set by the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006

5. Romford v Marlborough LCRO 123 / 2009 (15 December 2009) [PDF, 95 KB]

   Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyance’s Act 2006 and the decision of the Auckland Standards Committee 1is reversed

6. Dingwell v Auck SC 1 LCRO 166 / 2009 (15 December 2009) [PDF, 75 KB]

   Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyance’s Act 2006 and the decision of the Auckland’s Standards Committee 2 is confirmed

7. Saltcoates v Balfour LCRO 153 / 2009 (3 December 2009) [PDF, 45 KB]

   Pursuant to section 211(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyance’s Act, and for the reasons given above, the determination of the Standards Committee is confirmed

8. Lothian v Alloa LCRO 148 / 2009 (26 November 2009) [PDF, 46 KB]

   Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyance’s Act 2006 and the decision of the Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 2 is confirmed

9. Halesowen v Kelso LCRO 175-176 / 2009 (18 November 2009) [PDF, 91 KB]

   The application for review is declined on the basis that there is no jurisdiction to consider it. Pursuant to s 210 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006

10. Crieff v Tongue LCRO 162 / 2009 (13 November 2009) [PDF, 42 KB]

    Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyance’s  Act  2006  and  the  decision  of  the  Canterbury-Westland  Standards Committee 2 is confirmed

11. Shrewsbury v Rothesay LCRO 99 / 2009 (13 November 2009) [PDF, 80 KB]

    Pursuant  to  section  211(1)(a)  of  the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 and the decision of the Standards Committee is cofirmed

12. Morpeth v Ramsey LCRO 110 / 2009 (12 November 2009) [PDF, 82 KB]

    Pursuant to s 209(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act the application for review is declined and the decision of the Standards Committee is upheld

13. Campbeltown v Dunoon LCRO 129 / 2009 (11 November 2009) [PDF, 85 KB]

    Pursuant to s 209(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyance’s Act

14. Poole v Yorkshire LCRO 133 / 2009 (11 November 2009) [PDF, 71 KB]

    Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act the decision of the Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee is modified

15. Evesham v Auckland Standards Committee LCRO 136 / 2009 (5 November 2009) [PDF, 190 KB]

    Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyance’s Act 2006 and the decision of the Auckland’s Standards Committee 2 is confirmed

16. Jedburgh v Aberdeen LCRO 119 / 2009 (29 October 2009) [PDF, 84 KB]

    Standard of competence and diligence expected of a reasonably competent lawyer / Conduct of lawyers during cross-examination

17. LCRO 164/2009 Lydd v Maryport [PDF, 166 KB]

    Date of Decision: 19 October 2009.

18. Appleby Building Ltd v C Alva LCRO 117 / 2009 (12 October 2009) [PDF, 54 KB]

    No improper purpose in maintaining hopeless defence on instructions / privilege no bar to obligation to produce documents to Standards Committee

19. Fishguard & Cannock v Walsall LCRO 109 / 2009 (9 October 2009) [PDF, 81 KB]

    Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyance’s Act 2006 I confirm the determination of the Standards Committee, subject only to amending the determination to show the practitioners as the Respondents

20. Victor v Stratford LCRO 135 / 2009 (9 October 2009) [PDF, 58 KB]

    Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyance’s Act 2006 and the Standards Committee is directed pursuant to s 209 to reconsider and determine the specific matter

21. Walsall v Monmouth LCRO 100 / 2009 (8 October 2009) [PDF, 75 KB]

    Lawyer failed to act diligently in circumstances

22. Wallasey v Bala LCRO 86 / 2009 (14 September 2009) [PDF, 87 KB]

    Lawyer prohibited from contacting the client of another lawyer / lawyer prohibited from acting as both counsel and witness for the same matter

23. LCRO 112/2009 KO - Decision on Jurisdiction (4 September 2009) [PDF, 58 KB]

    Date of decision: 4 September 2009

24. LCRO 112-2009 KO [PDF, 87 KB]

    4 September 2009

25. Cambridge v Whitehaven LCRO 122 / 2009 (4 September 2009) [PDF, 85 KB]

    The application for review is declined for lack of jurisdiction.