Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
Helpful search tips:
1326 items matching your search terms
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
LCRO upholds Standards Committee decision / Pursuant to section 211 (1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006
Pursuant to Section 211 (1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed saved as is modified
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
LCRO confirmed Standards Committee decision to prosecute / Bias allegations dismissed, costs against Applicant.
Pursuant to Section 211 (1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed saved as is modified.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
LCRO upheld Standards Committee decision / Pursuant to section 211 (1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006
File referred to Standards Committee member for report to Committee / Committee member treated as if referral for costs assessor's report and proceeded to call for files and hold meetings with parties.
Pursuant to s209(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, direct the Standards Committee to reconsider the specific matter of whether the fee of Mr BF was reasonable putting aside the records of Mr BF in respect of the time he claims was spent on the matter.
LCRO quashed Standards Committee order to reducing Practitioner's fee when there was no disciplinary finding by Standards Committee that Practitioner had breached Rule 9 (excessive charging), nor evidence of overcharging.
Review applications limited to determinations pursuant to section 152 / requirements pursuant to sections 141 and 147 / orders pursuant to section 156 and directions given pursuant to sections 142 and 143.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Paragraph 12 Trust Account Regulations / payment to third parties / Lawyer requiring photo ID of intended payee.
The decision of the Auckland Standards Committee 1 is quashed / Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006.
Client complained about fees and conduct issues / Standards Committee addressed fees only and determined to take no further action on complaints.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Standards Committee considered 5 bills of cost - note that 4 were over 2 years old / the complaint was dismissed under Regulation 29 of the (Lawyers: Complaints Service and Standards Committees) Regulations 2008.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed