Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
Helpful search tips:
1323 items matching your search terms
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to section 211(I ) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2008 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to Section 211(1) the determination of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to section 211(1) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 I confirm the decision of the Standards Committee
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) the decision of the Standards Committee is modified in respect of orders for compensation, but is otherwise confirmed
The application for review is declined on the basis of no jurisdiction to consider it.
The application for review is declined pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 and the decision of the National Standards Committee is confirmed.
The application for review is declined pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 and the decision of the Canterbury Standards Committee 1 is confirmed.
The application for review is declined pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 and the decision of the Auckland Standards Committee 2 is confirmed.
The application for review is upheld pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 and the decision of the Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 is reversed and the Standards Committee is directed to reconsider the matter pursuant to s 209 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006.
The application for review is upheld pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act. The decision of the Auckland Standards Committee is reversed.
Disclosure of confidential information held by law firm re former client / Each practitioner is individually and personally for his or her own professional conduct/ Breach of unsatisfactory conduct
The application for review is declined pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 and the decision of the National Standards Committee is confirmed.
The application for review is declined pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 and the decision of the Auckland’s Standards Committee 2 is confirmed.
The application for review is declined pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 and the decision of the Auckland Standards Committee 4 is confirmed.
The application for review is upheld pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 and the decision of the Auckland Standards Committee 2 is reversed
It is unacceptable for a single firm to act for two parties who are in dispute with each other
Jurisdiction of LCRO to consider review when application form and / or fee received outside 30 working days
Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
The LCRO's powers do not extend to the discretion of whether there is jurisdiction to hear a review, these guidelines are set by the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006