Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
Helpful search tips:
1328 items matching your search terms
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to Section 211 (1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed saved as is modified by this decision
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
Pursuant to Section 211 (1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed saved as is modified
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Allegations against Practitioner of conflicting interests not upheld / Privilege belongs to a client not their lawyer. Rule 5.4.
Complaints of unreasonable delay and overcharging not upheld by the Standards Committee / Confirmed by LCRO on review.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
SC found conduct not "regulated service" / Discussions of s 12(c) / LCA and circumstances where this may apply where a lawyer is not providing regulated services.
LCRO confirmed SC decision of unsatisfactory conduct / Pursuant to section 211 (1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Distinction between lawyer as solicitor, and lawyer as executor / attorney. Duty of executor/ Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
The application for review is upheld pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006. The decision of the Auckland Standards Committee is confirmed.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
The application for review is upheld pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006. The decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed but modified.