Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act, the Standards Committee decisions, in respect of both the Practitioner and NC, Are confirmed.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
Helpful search tips:
1326 items matching your search terms
Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act, the Standards Committee decisions, in respect of both the Practitioner and NC, Are confirmed.
LCRO applied to the Court to exercise its inherent jurisdiction to compel the lawyer to provide files and time records. High Court made order accordingly and indicated that it would give consideration to suspending practitioner if he failed to do so. Discussion as to relationship between s351(2)(b)(iii) LCA and Reg 29(a) Complaints Service and Standards Committee Regulations.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
The determination of the Standards Committee is reversed.
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the determination of the Standards Committee is modified.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
The LCRO confirmed the Standards Committee decision that there were no "special circumstances" for reviewing a bill below $2,000. Discussion of "special circumstances".
The LCRO confirmed the Standards Committee decision and upheld that there was no breach of Rule 12 or 12.3 of the Rules of Conduct and Client Care.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Standards Committee made finding of breach of Rule 3.1 Conduct and Client Care Rules / Accepted that the conduct must be measured objectively and not by the client's responses / Finding of breach of Rule 3.1 reversed.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
Date of decision: 10 September 2012
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to section 206(4) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006,