Ministry of Justice

HDCA

• A declaration pursuant to s 54(1)(a) of the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 that the defendant breached the Health and Disability Commissioner (Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights) Regulations 1996 in respect of Right 4(1) by failing to provide services to the aggrieved person with reasonable care and skill, and Right 4(4) by failing to provide services in a manner that minimised potential harm to, and optimised the quality of life of the aggrieved person. 

PA

• A declaration made under s 85(1)(d) of the Privacy Act 1993 for an interference with privacy by breaching IPP 6.

• Damages under s 85(1)(c) and s 88(1)(c) of the Act for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings.

PA

• A declaration under s 85(1)(a) of the Privacy Act 1993 for an interference with privacy by breaching IPP 6.

• Damages for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings under ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(c) of the Privacy Act 1993.

PA

• A declaration under s 85(1)(a) for an interference with Privacy by failing to respond to an information privacy request in accordance with the Privacy Act 1993

• Damages for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings under s 88(1)(c) of the Privacy Act 1993

PA

• A declaration under s 85(1)(a) of the Privacy Act 1993 for failing to respond to an information privacy request in accordance with s 40(1) of the Privacy Act 1993

• Damages for injury to feelings under s 88(1)(c) of the Privacy Act 1993

PA

• A declaration under s 102(2)(a) of the Privacy Act 2020 for failure to provide information

• Damages for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings under s 103(1)(d) of the Privacy Act 2020

• Pecuniary losses under s 103(1)(a) of the Privacy Act 2020

PA

• A declaration under s 85(1)(a) of the Privacy Act 1993 that Helensville Primary School Board interfered with Mr and Ms Cunliffe's privacy by failing to respond to their information privacy requests in accordance with the Privacy Act 1993

• Damages under s 88(1)(c) of the Privacy Act 1993 for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings. Plaintiff 1

Ms C
$15,000

• Damages under s 88(1)(c) of the Privacy Act 1993 for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings. Plaintiff 2

Mr C
$10,000

HRA

• A declaration under s 92I(3)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1993 that the defendant racially harassed the plaintiff in breach of s 63 of the Human Rights Act 1993

• Damages under s 92I(3)(c) and s 92M(1)(c) of the Human Rights Act 1993 for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings

HRA

• A declaration under s92I(3)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1993 that the defendant breached Part 2 of the Human Rights Act by way of sexual harassment

• Damages under s 92M(1)(a) for pecuniary loss

• Damages under s 92M(1)(c) of the Human Rights Act 1993 for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings

PA

• A declaration under s 85(1)(a) of the Privacy Act 1993 that there was an interference with privacy

• Damages under s 85(1)(c) of the Privacy Act 1993 for injury to feelings

HRA

• A declaration under s 92I(3)(a) of the Human Rights Act 1993 that Part 1A of the Human Rights Act 1993 was breached by discrimination

• Damages for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings

HRA

• s 92I(3)(a) – declaration of breach under s 22(1)

• ss 92I(3)(c) and 92M(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

HRA

• s 92I(3)(a) – declaration of breach under s 22(1)

• ss 92I(3)(c) and 92M(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

HRA

• s 92I(3)(a) – declaration of breach under s 63

• ss 92I(3)(c) and 92M(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

• s 92I(3)(f) – training order

PA

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of interference with privacy

• s 85(1)(d) – order to provide copy of documents

• s 85(1)(b) – damages for loss of benefit:
  • Ms B
  • Ms C

$5,000

$5,000

• s 85(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm:
  • Ms A
  • Ms B
  • Ms C

$30,000

$30,000

$30,000

HRA

• s 92I(3)(a) – declaration of breach under s 22(1)

• ss 92I(3)(c) and 92M(1)(a) – damages for pecuniary loss

• ss 92I(3)(c) and 92M(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

• s 92I(3)(f) – training order

PA

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of interference with privacy

• ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(b) – damages for loss of benefit

• ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

• s 85(1)(d) – order directing IPP 6 request be complied with

PA

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of interference with privacy

• ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

• ss 85(1)(d)– apology to be given by EIT to both plaintiffs

PA

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of interference with privacy

• ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(b) – damages for loss of benefit

• ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

• ss 85(1)(d) and (e) – agreed contribution towards seeking legal advice

PA

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of interference with privacy

• ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

PA

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration D1 & D2 interfered with P’s privacy

• ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(c) – damages for injury to feelings (D1)

• ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(c) – damages for injury to feelings (D2).

PA

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of interference with privacy
• s 85(1)(b) – order restraining Mr Slater from continuing or repeating interferences with Mr Blomfield’s privacy
• s 85(1)(d) – take down order

• ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm.

$70,000

HRA

• s 92I(3)(a) – declaration that first and second defendants committed a breach of s 53(1)(c) by discriminating against plaintiff by reason of her reliance on a guide dog.

• ss 92I(3)(c) and 92M(1)(c) – damages for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings.

$4,000

PA

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of interference with privacy

• ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of   interference with privacy

• s 85(1)(c) and s 88(1)(b) – damages for loss of benefit

• s 85(1)(c) and s 88(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

• s 85(1)(d) and (e) – order that the Crown comply with the information privacy requests made by Mr   Dotcom.

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of   interference with privacy

• ss 85(1)(c) and 88(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

$7,500

• s 92I(3)(a) – declaration that first and second defendants committed a breach of s 63 by subjecting plaintiff to racial harassment.

• ss 92I(3)(c) and 92M(1)(c) – damages for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings.

$25,000

• s 92I(3)(f) – order that first defendant, in conjunction with the Human Rights Commission, undertake training in relation to his obligations under the Human Rights Act 1993 to ensure he and any future employees are aware of those obligations.

• s 92I(3)(a) – declaration that defendant breached the terms of the settlement of the plaintiff’s sexual   harassment complaint.
• s 92I(3)(b) – order restraining defendant from continuing or repeating the breaches of his   confidentiality obligations under the settlement, or from engaging in, or causing or permitting others to engage in, conduct of the same kind as that constituting the breach or conduct of any similar kind.

• ss 92I(3)(c) and 92M(1)(a) – damages for pecuniary loss in the form of lost earnings.

• ss 92I(3)(c) and 92M(1)(a) – damages for pecuniary loss in the form of legal expenses.

• ss 92I(3)(c) and 92M(1)(c) – damages for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings.

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of   interference with privacy

• s 85(1)(c) and s 88(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

$2,000

• s 85(1)(d) and (e) – order that Whangarei District Council, in conjunction with the Privacy Commissioner and at its own expense, provide training to its councillors and management staff in relation to their and the Whangarei District Council’s obligations under the Privacy Act 1993.

• s 92I(3)(a) – declaration that defendant committed breach of s 22(1) by discriminating against plaintiff for reason of a physical disability or impairment suspected or assumed or believed by Schindler to exist.

• ss 92I(3)(c) and 92M(1)(a) – damages for pecuniary loss in the form of lost wages

• ss 92I(3)(c) and 92M(1)(a) – damages for pecuniary loss in the form of travel expenses

• ss 92I(3)(c) and 92M(1)(c) – damages for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings

• s 92I(3)(f) – order that defendant, in conjunction with Human Rights Commission, provide training to senior management staff in relation to their and defendant’s obligations under the Human Rights Act 1993.

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of   interference with privacy

• s 85(1)(c) and s 88(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

$400

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of   interference with privacy

• s 85(1)(c) and s 88(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

$18,000

• s 85(1)(d) and (e) – order that Mr Crampton attend, at his own expense, an “Introduction to the Privacy Act” workshop run by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner.

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of   interference with privacy

• s 85(1)(c) and s 88(1)(b) – damages for loss of benefit

• s 85(1)(c) and s 88(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

• s 85(1)(d) and (e) – order that CCDHB provide to Ms Watson (without redaction) the two withheld   documents within five days after the date of decision.

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of   interference with privacy

• s 85(1)(c) and s 88(1)(b) – damages for loss of benefit

• s 85(1)(c) and s 88(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

• s 85(1)(d) and (e) – order that Orcon Ltd, in conjunction with the Privacy Commissioner, provide training to its staff in relation to the obligations of Orcon Ltd under the Privacy Act 1993

[Decision set aside on 2 June 2015 and re-hearing ordered. See new decision at [2016] NZHRRT 38 (23 December 2016)]

HRA

• s 92I(3)(a) – declaration that first and second defendants committed a breach of s 63 by subjecting plaintiff to racial harassment.
• s 92I(3)(b) – order   restraining first and second defendants from continuing or repeating the   breach of s 63.

• ss 92I(3)(c) and 92M(1)(c) – damages for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings.

$45,000

• s 92I(3)(f) – order that first and second defendants, in conjunction with the Human Rights Commission, provide training to first defendant and management staff of second defendant in relation to their and Scorpion Liquor’s obligations under the Human Rights Act 1993.

• s 85(1)(a) – declaration of   interference with privacy

• s 85(1)(c) and s 88(1)(a) – damages for pecuniary loss in the form of lost income

• s 85(1)(c) and s 88(1)(a) – damages for pecuniary loss in the form of legal expenses

• s 85(1)(c) and s 88(1)(b) – damages for loss of benefit

• s 85(1)(c) and s 88(1)(c) – damages for emotional harm

• s 85(1)(b), (d) and (e) – restraining order
• s 85(1)(d) and (e) – retraction of information
• s 85(1)(d) – retraction of email and apology to be given
• s 85(1)(d) and (e) – order   that NZCU Baywide, in conjunction with the Privacy Commissioner, provide training to its management staff in relation to their and NZCU Baywide’s   obligations under the Privacy Act 1993.