Search Results

1. ET & JT v AQ [2024] NZDT 295 (13 May 2024) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...photographs of the damage to [car 1] shows damage on the left rear through to the left wheel. The photographs of the damage to [car 2] shows damage to the front right side of AQ’s car. 10. AQ was either travelling too closely to be able to perform the manoeuvre safely or to avoid a collision if [car 1] braked suddenly. The photographs evidence this. In fact, given the damage to the cars it is more likely than not that [car 1] did not brake suddenly. In any event as I have said above...

2. VH Ltd v KI [2024] NZDT 386 (24 June 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...APPLICANT VH Ltd RESPONDENT KI The Tribunal orders: 1. KI is not liable to pay the sum of $13801.15 to VH Ltd. 2. VH Ltd’s claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. This dispute arises as a result of email hacking, more formally known as business comprise (BEC) fraud. In September-October 2023 VH Ltd carried out landscaping work on KI’s property. 2. On 4 October 2023 VH Ltd sent KI an invoice for $13801.15 for the final payment of the landscaping w...

3. [2020] NZEmpC 85 Labour Inspector v Cypress Villas Ltd [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...offer as containing a monetary offer as well. I do make the comment, however, that the reference to the offer at mediation in paragraph [1] of the letter containing the Calderbank offer breaches s 148 of the Act, as it reveals confidential information from the mediation. In the circumstances, however, I consider that was nothing more than an inadvertent breach. So far as the sworn affidavit was concerned, the letter containing the Calderbank offer also annexed a draft form of t...

4. Bell v Shadforth [2018] NZIACDT 1 [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...include any material from a medical practitioner. The information is not in itself sufficient to have any bearing on whether the Tribunal should uphold the complaint. Potentially, it could have some relevance to sanctions. [14] Ms Shadforth has requested that the information not be disclosed to the complainant. Given the irrelevance of the information to making the determination as to whether to uphold the complaint, no further action will be taken regarding that material at this po...

5. Submit invoices & timesheets

   ...keep your receipts or taxable supply information, and submit this along with your reimbursement claim as this is required as proof of expenditure. Taxable supply information includes tax invoices, but it can also include information held in other forms, such as receipts and bank statements. We accept both digital and paper taxable supply information. Please include a description of the expense on the invoice. The description must include the date, description of the travel, cost, and suppl...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Lawyers & service providers >
   3. Service providers >
   4. Interpreting in courts & tribunals

6. Kai Tahu Ki Otago - EiC - E Ellison - Culture (5 Feb 2021) [PDF, 1.3 MB]

   ...Moeraki, Kāti Huirapa Rūnaka ki Puketeraki, Te Rūnanga o Ōtākou and Hokonui Rūnanga (collectively mana whenua). I have extensive experience in representing the Kāi Tahu Otago Rūnaka in Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) matters. 2. I am a former Manager Iwi Liaison at Otago Regional Council (ORC) and former Deputy Kaiwhakahaere for Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu. I am the chair of Aukaha, chairperson of the New Zealand Conservation Authority, a member of the NZ Biological Nat...

7. Richardson v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work Related Gradual Process Injury) [2024] NZACC 161 (7 October 2024) [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...September 2022, recording the date of injury as 3 March 2022. [11] On 20 September 2022, Dr Jenny Jones, GP, certified Mr Richardson fully unfit to work from 12 September 2022 to 26 September 2022, recording the date of injury as 3 March 2022 and requesting weekly compensation for an incapacity starting on 12 September 2022. [12] On 22 September 2022, Dr Amanda Ragg, Radiologist, reported on a right wrist MRI of Mr Richardson. Dr Ragg questioned whether there was dorsal spurring...

8. BK v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 561 (14 November 2023) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...Properties Ltd v Earthquake Commission [2015] NZHC 1690 at para 73. 2 See Woolley v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd [2023] NZCA 266. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 as receiving one coaching call, one squad call, and access to an app for logging information). This seems to be a reasonable exercise of N Ltd’s discretion, and I conclude that BK is not contractually entitled to any further refund. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 14 November 2023 Page 3 of 3...

9. Livingstone v Animal Health Board — Lake Rotoaira Forest Lands (2009) 245 Aotea MB 124 (245 AOT 124) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...consideration are whether it is still appropriate to grant an injunction as sought, whether the Board has acted in contempt and whether costs are now properly payable. Background [4] By application received on 24 July 2009 the Animal Health Board requested the Registrar to convene meetings of beneficial owners for Mangahouhou 1, Oraukura 1, Waihi Kahakaharoa 8A, 8B and Waipapa 2B 2A. The purpose of the proposed meetings was to consult with the owners about a proposed 1080 drop. [...

10. Cooper v Hamilton Pharmacy 2011 Ltd (Pre-Trial Admissibility Ruling) [2018] NZHRRT 53 [pdf, 3.8 MB]

    ...allow Hamilton Pharmacy an opportunity to produce additional evidence. [15.4] The Tribunal is not bound by the same rules of evidence as a court. [16] In summary, Mr Cooper submits the evidence is the best available evidence of this aspect of his claim. To deny him the ability to have the evidence heard (and tested) would cause him substantial prejudice as it forms the foundation of a significant part of his claim. The evidence is relevant, not hearsay and Hamilton Pharmacy is already p...