Search Results

1. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – summary record 15th-17th reports (continued) [pdf, 66 KB]

   UNITED NATIONS CERD International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination Distr. GENERAL CERD/C/SR.1822 8 August 2007 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION Seventy-first session SUMMARY RECORD OF THE 1822nd MEETING Held at the Palais Wilson, Geneva, on Thursday, 2 August 2007, at 10 a.m. Chairperson: Mr. de GOUTTES CONTENTS CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS, COMMENTS AND INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY STA...

2. [2008] NZEmpC AC 24/08 Panovski v Marine Trimmers and All Awnings 2004 Ltd [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...was discussed, Mr Steers did not expressly state that any improvement was required, nor was any warning or a caution given about Mr Panovski’s workmanship. [7] A number of other jobs were also discussed at the meeting. They were not jobs performed solely by Mr Panovski. Mr Steers says that he raised these as examples of the problems the defendant was experiencing and why it could not increase Mr Panovski’s pay. Mr Steers claims that they also discussed the time Mr Panovski...

3. LCRO 59/2021 RY v QX (21 December 2022) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...company in Mr RY’s place. [11] It was necessary to transfer ownership of the trust’s properties to the new trustees, VF, OZ, and the firm’s trustee company. For that purpose, VF and OZ signed the necessary Authority and Instructions (A&I) forms for themselves, as trustees, and for Mr RY claiming to be his attorney pursuant to the power of attorney contained in clause 12(2) of the Trust Deed. [12] To enable electronic registration of the transfers by e-dealing on 1 March 2...

4. LCRO 236/2017 HC and CI v PR (10 December 2019) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...High Court. [7] This decision necessarily proceeds on the basis of the materials that were before the Committee, and a determination of unsatisfactory conduct that cannot be overturned by this Office on review, whatever alternate view might be formed as to the propriety of the unsatisfactory conduct determination or the complainants’ veracity. [8] For an order to be made pursuant to s 156(1)(d) of the Act, there must be evidence that supports the complainants’ claim to compens...

5. BD v DS Ltd [2020] NZDT 1504 (14 October 2020) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...does not necessarily mean they had something to hide. There could be other reasons. Conclusion 25. For the reasons above, DS’s claim is dismissed. Referee: Ms G Jaduram Date: 14 October 2020 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

6. CT & ID v S Ltd [2022] NZDT 7 (2 March 2022) [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 7 APPLICANT CT APPLICANT ID RESPONDENT S Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 11 March 2021 CT and ID (the applicants) engaged S Limited (SL) to perform a pre- purchase inspection report on [address] (the property). 2. Some months after purchasing the property, the applicants became aware of issues with the windows and water ingress. 3. The applicants are claiming $9,328.90, being...

7. EC v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 186 (13 June 2023) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...provide to their customers. They said however that every issue that EC encountered was dealt with and resolved by U Ltd, and that overall, even taken together, they considered that the service provided was reasonable. 13. I have taken all of the information provided by both parties into account and I am unable to make a finding that U Ltd’s service was not provided with reasonable care and skill in this case. 14. I can see that there were a number of issues that EC encountered in...

8. BE v ZI Ltd [2022] NZDT 265 (17 December 2022) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...the total amount of $18,400.00. Conclusion 19. For these reasons ZI Ltd is to pay BE the sum of $18,400.00 including GST by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 17 December 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

9. FQ v T Ltd [2022] NZDT 248 (24 November 2022) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...satisfied that loss was reasonably foreseeable. I find FQ is entitled to be paid by T Ltd $4,000.00 for this loss. Referee: B Curtis Date: 24 November 2022 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

10. MW & NW v SL & TE [2023] NZDT 510 (20 September 2023) [pdf, 217 KB]

    ...a 15% discount is appropriate, or in other words MW and NW should be reimbursed for 85% of the expense. 15. SL and TE are to pay MW and NW $2,737.31. Referee: M Wilson Date: 20 September 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...