Interim determination summary TRI 2008-100-000031/DBH 02998. Decision 14 July 2009. See also the Marywil Investments Ltd v North Shore Ctiy Council interim determination. This determination was appealed to the High Court but was later discontinued.
If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, Weathertight Homes Tribunal negligence).
419 items matching your search terms
Interim determination summary TRI 2008-100-000031/DBH 02998. Decision 14 July 2009. See also the Marywil Investments Ltd v North Shore Ctiy Council interim determination. This determination was appealed to the High Court but was later discontinued.
Review of eligibilty decision DBH 05928. Decision date 8 July 2009. See also the Trustees of the Speirs Family Trust review of eligibilty decision summary.
Review of eligibilty decision summary DBH 05928. Decision date 8 July 2009. See also the Trustees of the Speirs Family Trust review of eligibilty decision.
Final determination TRI 2008-100-000127/DBH 05638. Decision date 3 July 2009. See also the Greaterex v Preston final determination summary.
Decision on costs summary TRI 2007-100-000041/DBH 05001. Decision date 27 June 2009. See also the Tabram v Slater final determination, the Tabram v Slater final determination summary, and the TabramvSlater-Decision costs decision.
Costs determination summary TRI 2008-101-000045/DBH 05356. Decision date 23 June 2009. See also the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited interim determination, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited interim determination summary, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited costs determination, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited final determination, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited final determination summary, and the High Court Nachum v Weathertight Homes Tribunal appeal decision HC Wellington CIV-2009-485-2070.
Costs determination TRI 2008-101-000045/DBH 05356. Decision date 23 June 2009. See also the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited interim determination, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited interim determination summary, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited costs determination summary, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited final determination, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited final determination summary, and the High Court Nachum v Weathertight Homes Tribunal appeal decision HC Wellington CIV-2009-485-2070.
Final determination TRI 2008-100-000046/DBH 00606. Decision date 11 June 2009. See also the Bacic v Tulip Holdings Limited (in liq) summary, and the High Court Lake v Bacic appeal decision HC Auckland CIV-2009-004-1625.
Final determination summary TRI 2008-100-000046/DBH 00606. Decision date 11 June 2009. See also the Bacic v Tulip Holdings Limited (in liq) final determination, and the High Court Lake v Bacic appeal decision HC Auckland CIV-2009-004-1625.
Procedural order no 2 TRI 2009-101-000015-000018/DBH 05319, 05320, 05322 & 05326. Order date 11 June 2009. This procedural order deals with the joinder and removal of certain parties, particularly the removal of an employee employed by an independent building certifier which issued the building consent and carried out inspections for the building project. See also the Mayfair Street Units v Spargo procedural order no 2 summary, the Mayfair Street Units v Spargo amended final determination, and the Mayfair Street Units v Spargo final determination summary.
Interim determination, TRI 2008-101-000098/DBH 04231. Decision date 29 May 2009. See also the Aitken v Laudermilk summary, the Aitken v Laudermilk final determination, and the Aitken v Laudermilk final determination summary.
Interim determination summary TRI 2008-101-000098/DBH 04231. Decision date 29 May 2009. See also the Aitken v Laudermilk interim determination, the Aitken v Laudermilk final determination, and the Aitken v Laudermilk final determination summary.
Decision on costs TRI 2007-100-000041/DBH 05001. Decision date 27 May 2009. See also the Tabram v Slater final determination, the Tabram v Slater costs decision, and the TabramvSlater costs decision summary.
Final determination summary TRI 2008-100-000001/DBH 02592. Decision date 13 May 2009. See also the Sell v Harris final determination, and the High Court Harris v Sell appeal decision HC Auckland CIV 2009-404-003465.
Final determination TRI 2008-100-000001/DBH 02592. Decision date 13 May 2009. See also the Sell v Harris final determination summary, and the High Court Harris v Sell appeal decision HC Auckland CIV 2009-404-003465.
Determination summary TRI 2008-101-000074, 000103-000105, 000112 & 000113/DBH 04221, 04288, 04289, 4290, 04543, 04801. Decision date 8 May 2009. See also the Chen v Christchurch City Council determination.
Determination TRI 2008-101-000074, 000103-000105, 000112 & 000113/DBH 04221, 04288, 04289, 4290, 04543, 04801. Decision date 8 May 2009. See also the Chen v Christchurch City Council determination summary.
Interim determination summary TRI 2008-101-000045/DBH 05356. Decision date 30 April 2009. This interim determination was appealed and cross-appealed to the High Court but were both unsuccessful leaving the matter of the judicial review application to still be determined. See also the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited interim determination, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited costs determination, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited costs determination summary, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited final determination, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited final determination summary, and the High Court Nachum v Weathertight Homes Tribunal appeal decision HC Wellington CIV-2009-485-2070.
Interim determination TRI 2008-101-000045/DBH 05356. Decision date 30 April 2009. This interim determination was appealed and cross-appealed to the High Court but were both unsuccessful leaving the matter of the judicial review application to still be determined. See also the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited interim determination summary, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited costs determination, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited costs determination summary, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited final determination, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited final determination summary, and the High Court Nachum v Weathertight Homes Tribunal appeal decision HC Wellington CIV-2009-485-2070.
Costs determination TRI 2007-100-000064/DBH 01814. Decision date 23 April 2009. See also the White v Rodney District Council final determination, the White v Rodney District Council final determination summary, the White v Rodney District Council costs decision, and the High Court White v RodneyDC appeal decision HC Auckland CIV-2009-404-1880.
Costs determination TRI 2007-100-000064/DBH 01814. Decision date 23 April 2009. See also the White v Rodney District Council final determination, the White v Rodney District Council final determination summary, the White v Rodney District Council costs decision summary, and the High Court White v RodneyDC appeal decision HC Auckland CIV-2009-404-1880.
Final determination TRI 2007-100-000041/DBH 05001. Decision date 17 April 2009. See also the Tabram v Slater final determination summary, the Tabram v Slater costs decision, and the TabramvSlater costs decision summary.
Final determination summary TRI 2007-100-000041/DBH 05001. Decision date 17 April 2009. See also the Tabram v Slater final determination, the Tabram v Slater costs decision, and the TabramvSlater costs decision summary.
Procedural order 4 summary TRI 2008-101-000111/DBH 04840. Order date 9 April 2009. In this procedural order, the Tribunal deals with the removals of certain parties with particular regard to the interpretation of the vendor warranty clause in the standard agreement for sale and purchase. See also the Brown v Christchurch City Council procedural order 4.
Procedural order 4 TRI 2008-101-000111/DBH 04840. Order date 9 April 2009. In this procedural order, the Tribunal deals with the removals of certain parties with particular regard to the interpretation of the vendor warranty clause in the standard agreement for sale and purchase. See also the Brown v Christchurch City Council procedural order 4 summary.