- If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
- If you are doing a keyword search (eg, negligence), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, Weathertight Homes Tribunal negligence).
-
Procedural order no 7 summary TRI 2008-101-000109/DBH 05331. Order date 1 September 2009. This procedural order deals with applications of removal and joinder with a particular focus on the role of suppliers and whether they are responsible for the misapplication of their products. See also the Holden v Hanns procedural order no 7.
-
Procedural order no 7 TRI 2008-101-000109/DBH 05331. Order date 1 September 2009. This procedural order deals with applications of removal and joinder with a particular focus on the role of suppliers and whether they are responsible for the misapplication of their products. See also the Holden v Hanns procedural order no 7 summary.
-
Determination summary TRI 2009-100-000022/DBH 01666. Decision date 26 August 2009. See also the Abernethy v Coughlan determination, and the High Court Coughlan v Abernethy appeal decision HC Auckland CIV-2009-004-2374.
-
Determination TRI 2009-100-000022/DBH 01666. Decision date 26 August 2009. See also the Abernethy v Coughlan summary, and the High Court Coughlan v Abernethy appeal decision HC Auckland CIV-2009-004-2374.
-
Final determination summary TRI 2008-100-000107/DBH 04634. Decision date 17 August 2009. See also the Crosswell v Auckland City Council final determination. This determination was appealed to the High Court but was later withdrawn.
-
Final determination TRI 2008-100-000107/DBH 04634. Decision date 17 August 2009. See also the Crosswell v Auckland City Council final determination summary. This determination was appealed to the High Court but was later withdrawn.
-
Final determination TRI 2008-101-000059 & 66/DBH 05513 & 5488. Decision date 13 August 2009. See also the Brodav Ltd v Waters determination, the Brodav Ltd v Waters determination summary, and the Brodav Ltd v Waters final determination summary.
-
Final determination summary TRI 2008-101-000059 & 66/DBH 05513 & 5488. Decision date 13 August 2009. See also the Brodav Ltd v Waters determination, the Brodav Ltd v Waters determination summary, and the Brodav Ltd v Waters final determination.
-
Review of eligibility decision summary DBH 05554. Decision date 11 August 2008. See also the Dixonlane Apartments review of eligibility decision.
-
Amended final determination TRI 2008-100-000101/DBH 05051. Decision date 11 August 2009. See also the Johnston v Abide Homes Limited amended final determination summary.
-
Amended final determination summary TRI 2008-100-000101/DBH 05051. Decision date 11 August 2009. See also the Johnston v Abide Homes Limited amended final determination.
-
Final determination TRI 2008-101-000052/DBH 05463. Decision date 5 August 2009. See also the River Oaks Farm Ltd & Ors as Trustees of Ingodwe Trust v Olsson final determination summary.
-
Final determination summary TRI 2008-101-000052/DBH 05463. Decision date 5 August 2009. See also the River Oaks Farm Ltd & Ors as Trustees of Ingodwe Trust v Olsson final determination.
-
Procedural order no 2 summary TRI 2009-101-000026/DBH 05690. Decision date 4 August 2009. In this procedural order, the Tribunal deals with certain joinder and removal applications with particular regards to issues such as the use of plans without the designer's permission and the joinder of employees of building certifiers. See also the Dixon v Dixon procedural order no 2.
-
Procedural order no 2 TRI 2009-101-000026/DBH 05690. Decision date 4 August 2009. In this procedural order, the Tribunal deals with certain joinder and removal applications with particular regards to issues such as the use of plans without the designer's permission and the joinder of employees of building certifiers. See also the Dixon v Dixon procedural order no 2 summary.
-
Procedural order no 2 TRI 2009-101-000022/DBH 05711. Order date 3 August 2009. In this procedural order, the Tribunal deals with certain removal applications regarding some of the issues pertaining to building certifiers, disclaimers, negligent misstatement and the Fair Trading Act. See also the Carey Clan Trust v Still procedural order no 2 summary, the Carey Clan Trust v Still final determination, and the Carey Clan Trust v Still final determination summary.
-
Procedural order no 2 summary TRI 2009-101-000022/DBH 05711. Order date 3 August 2009. In this procedural order, the Tribunal deals with certain removal applications regarding some of the issues pertaining to building certifiers, disclaimers, negligent misstatement and the Fair Trading Act. See also the Carey Clan Trust v Still procedural order no 2, the Carey Clan Trust v Still final determination, and the Carey Clan Trust v Still final determination summary.
-
Final determination summary TRI 2008-100-000127/DBH 05638. Decision date 3 July 2009. See also the Greaterex v Preston final determination.
-
Final determination summaryTRI 2008-100-000094/DBH 00971. Decision date 24 July 2009. See also the McGregor v Jensen final determination, and the High Court Boyd v McGregor appeal decision HC Auckland CIV-2009-404-5332.
-
Final determination TRI 2008-100-000094/DBH 00971. Decision date 24 July 2009. See also the McGregor v Jensen final determination summary, and the High Court Boyd v McGregor appeal decision HC Auckland CIV-2009-404-5332.
-
Final determination summary TRI 2008-101-000098/DBH 04231. Decision date 22 July 2009. See also the Aitken v Laudermilk interim determination, the Aitken v Laudermilk interim determination summary, and the Aitken v Laudermilk final determination.
-
Final determination TRI 2008-101-000098/DBH 04231. Decision date 22 July 2009. See also the Aitken v Laudermilk interim determination, the Aitken v Laudermilk interim determination summary, and the Aitken v Laudermilk final determination summary.
-
Determination TRI 2008-100-000091/DBH 05577. Decision date 21 July 2009. See also the Chee v Stareast Investment Ltd determination summary, and the High Court Chee v Stareast Investment Ltd appeal decision HC Auckland CIV-2009-404-5255.
-
Determination summary TRI 2008-100-000091/DBH 05577. Decision date 21 July 2009. See also the Chee v Stareast Investment Ltd determination, and the High Court Chee v Stareast Investment Ltd appeal decision HC Auckland CIV-2009-404-5255.
-
Interim determination TRI 2008-100-000031/DBH 02998. Decision 14 July 2009. See also the Marywil Investments Ltd v North Shore Ctiy Council interim determination summary. This determination was appealed to the High Court but was later discontinued.