Costs determination TRI 2008-101-000067/DBH 2946. Decision date 4 March 2010. See also the Tweeddale v Pearson [2010] NZWHT Wellington 4 summary, and the 2009 Tweeddale v Pearson substantive decision and summary.
If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, Weathertight Homes Tribunal negligence).
419 items matching your search terms
Costs determination TRI 2008-101-000067/DBH 2946. Decision date 4 March 2010. See also the Tweeddale v Pearson [2010] NZWHT Wellington 4 summary, and the 2009 Tweeddale v Pearson substantive decision and summary.
Amended final determination TRI 2009-101-000029/DBH 5613. Decision date 2 March 2010.
Final determination TRI 2009-100-000080/DBH 3886. Decision date 25 February 2010. See also the Gower v KPH Construction Ltd [2010] NZWHT Auckland 2 summary.
Final determination TRI 2007-100-000027/DBH 4603. Decision date 12 February 2010.
Final determination summary TRI 2009-101-000022/DBH 05711. Decision date 23 December 2009. See also the Carey Clan Trust v Still procedural order no 2, the Carey Clan Trust v Still procedural order no 2 summary, and the Carey Clan Trust v Still final determination.
Final determination TRI 2009-101-000022/DBH 05711. Decision date 23 December 2009. See also the Carey Clan Trust v Still procedural order no 2, the Carey Clan Trust v Still procedural order no 2 summary, and the Carey Clan Trust v Still final determination summary.
Final determination TRI 2009-101-000008/DBH 05631. Decision date 17 December 2009. See also the Holland & Ors as Trustees of the Harbourview Trust v Auckland City Council final determination summary, and the Holland & Ors as Trustees of the Harbourview Trust v Auckland City Council [2010] NZWHT Auckland 7 costs decision.
Final determination summary TRI 2009-101-000008/DBH 05631. Decision date 17 December 2009. See also the Holland & Ors as Trustees of the Harbourview Trust v Auckland City Council final determination, and the Holland & Ors as Trustees of the Harbourview Trust v Auckland City Council [2010] NZWHT Auckland 7 costs decision.
Determination summary TRI 2009-101-000064/DBH 05858. Decision date 16 December 2009. See also the Anderson Family Trust v Doyle determination.
Determination TRI 2009-101-000064/DBH 05858. Decision date 16 December 2009. See also the Anderson Family Trust v Doyle determination summary.
Final determination summary TRI 2008-101-000067/DBH 02946. Decision date 1 December 2009. See also the Tweeddale v Pearson final determination, the Tweeddale v Pearson [2010] NZWHT Wellington 4 costs decision, and the District Court Harley v Tweeddale appeal decision DC Palmerston North CIV-2009-054-764.
Final determination TRI 2008-101-000067/DBH 02946. Decision date 1 December 2009. See also the Tweeddale v Pearson final determination summary, the Tweeddale v Pearson [2010] NZWHT Wellington 4 costs decision, and the District Court Harley v Tweeddale appeal decision DC Palmerston North CIV-2009-054-764.
Determination TRI 2008-101-000100/DBH 05327. Decision date 11 November 2009. See also the Chapman v Western Bay of Plenty District Council determination summary, and the District Court Chapman v Western Bay of Plenty District Council appeal decision DC Hamilton CIV-2009-070-1237.
Final determination summary TRI 2009-100-000039/DBH 05653. Decision date 6 November 2009. See also the Hamblyn v Auckland City Council final determination.
Final determination TRI 2009-100-000039/DBH 05653. Decision date 6 November 2009. See also the Hamblyn v Auckland City Council final determination summary.
Review of eligibility decision DBH 05921. Decision date 30 September 2009. See also the Wilson review of eligibility decision summary.
Determination summary TRI 2008-101-000110/DBH 04892. Decision date 21 July 2009. See also the Allan v Christchurch City Council determination.
Determination TRI 2008-101-000110/DBH 04892. Decision date 21 July 2009. See also the Allan v Christchurch City Council determination summary.
Final determination summary TRI 2008-101-000045/DBH 05356. Decision date 21 September 2009. See also the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited interim determination, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited interim determination summary, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited costs determination, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited costs determination summary, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited final determination, and the High Court Nachum v Weathertight Homes Tribunal appeal decision HC Wellington CIV-2009-485-2070.
Final determination summary TRI 2008-101-000045/DBH 05356. Decision date 21 September 2009. See also the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited interim determination, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited interim determination summary, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited costs determination, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited costs determination summary, the Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited final determination, and the High Court Nachum v Weathertight Homes Tribunal appeal decision HC Wellington CIV-2009-485-2070.
Final determination summary TRI 2009-101-000015-000018/DBH 05319, 05320, 05322 & 05326. Decision date 21 September 2009. See also the Mayfair Street Units v Spargo procedural order no 2, the Mayfair Street Units v Spargo procedural order no 2 summary, and the Mayfair Street Units v Spargo amended final determination.
Final determination TRI 2008-100-000034/DBH 03882. Decision date 9 September 2009. See also the Findlay v Auckland City Council final determination summary, and the High Court Findlay & Anor as Trustees of the Lee Findlay Family Trust v Auckland City Council appeal decision HC Auckland CIV-2009-404-6497.
Final determination summary TRI 2008-100-000034/DBH 03882. Decision date 9 September 2009. See also the Findlay v Auckland City Council final determination, and the High Court Findlay & Anor as Trustees of the Lee Findlay Family Trust v Auckland City Council appeal decision HC Auckland CIV-2009-404-6497.
Procedural order no 4 summary TRI 2009-101-000014/DBH 4646. Order date 3 September 2009. In this procedural order, the Tribunal deals with issues surrounding a claimant who is claiming for the leaks against one of the subcontractors (a labour-only builder). That claimant however is a builder and he and his company managed the construction of the dwellinghouse. See also the Finlay v Baker procedural order no 4.
Procedural order no 4 TRI 2009-101-000014/DBH 4646. Order date 3 September 2009. In this procedural order, the Tribunal deals with issues surrounding a claimant who is claiming for the leaks against one of the subcontractors (a labour-only builder). That claimant however is a builder and he and his company managed the construction of the dwellinghouse. See also the Finlay v Baker procedural order no 4 summary.