Complaint company engaged crowd controller who did not hold a COA and continued to operate after licence expired – breaches were oversight only and processes changed to prevent further breaches – reprimand and warning.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
For related District Court decisions refer to the District Court website.
362 items matching your search terms
Complaint company engaged crowd controller who did not hold a COA and continued to operate after licence expired – breaches were oversight only and processes changed to prevent further breaches – reprimand and warning.
Complaint of breaches of s 66 and 67 of Act by failing to wear ID badge, produce COA on request or advise details of employer. Complaint proved – risk of badge being stolen is not a threat to safety of person – contravention of act is misconduct – ordered to attend training and reprimand
Complaint dismissed – ss66,73,74 – unsatisfactory conduct not found – supermarket security
Police complaint – unsatisfactory conduct & no longer suitable to be a certificate holder – one event not work related insufficient to conclude no longer suitable to be a certificate holder given positive work references – unsatisfactory conduct established – reprimand and order of further training.
Member of the Public complaint – Unsatisfactory conduct established - PI engaged by someone who wished to remain anonymous to contact the complainant and tell her that her husband was having an affair – no independent investigation – should not have accepted engagement.
Complaint of carrying on business as a crowd controller without a licence, complaint established. Breach ongoing despite being advised licence required – referred back to CIPU for possible prosecution – COA suspending pending further investigation
Complaint of trading without a licence and employing unlicenced guard – inquiry into whether company was suitable to hold a licence - Continued breaches of the Act, false information in application and lying to investigator – company licence declined – director no longer suitable to be a certificate holder. Referred back to consider prosecution action.
Police complaint – recent disqualifying conviction, gang membership, false declaration on application. COA cancelled.
Police Complaint – No longer suitable to be a certificate holder – offending as a result of mental health issues – strict conditions attached to COA
Complaint of no longer suitable to be a certificate holder on conduct and mental health grounds – COA cancelled – conditions to be met to reapply.
Complaint person working as crowd controller without COA - complaint established – warning letter issued.
Complaint that certificate holder worked outside the terms of his COA and breached the Act – Investigation established no factual basis to the complaint – complaint dismissed
Complaint based on failure to disclose Australian Convictions and prison sentence in application – conditions attached to COA and reprimand.
Complaint of running a private investigation business without a licence and outside the classes of his certificate – Section 5(3) holding yourself our as being ready to carry on a private investigation business is sufficient to fall within the definition of a private investigator – contravention of Act and misconduct established – COA in other classes cancelled, reprimand and fine.
Police complaint after disqualifying convictions – not suitable to be a certificate holder as a result of convictions – certificate cancelled.
Complaint upheld – ss74 & 83 – misconduct - theft – formal reprimand - COA continues on condition
Police complaint based on disqualifying conviction - COA expired by the time of conviction - Complaint upheld and closed.
Police compliant based on disqualifying conviction – COA expired by time of conviction – Complaint upheld and closed.
Complaint dismissed – ss 62(f)(vii) & 74 – offending addressed
Police Complaint – no longer suitable to be a certificate holder – false information given in application – certificate cancelled.
Complaint dismissed – s74 – alleged breach s67 and aggression – facts unproven
Complaint dismissed – s74 – alleged breach s67 and aggression – facts unproven – employer taking sufficient action
Object to COA based on convictions and gang membership – Being a patched member of Head Hunters inconsistent with responsibilities of security guard – COA declined
Complaint of working while licence suspended – details not proven but evidence of earlier bad practices – complaint dismissed but concerns need to be addressed before licence can be renewed.
Police objection to certificate renewal – conviction for causing harm by posting digital communications – serious but not grounds for disqualification – in all other respects a responsible