You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
For related District Court decisions refer to the District Court website.
51 items matching your search terms
CIPU Investigation into company licence holder – Contravention of s 45(1) by engaging security workers without COAs is misconduct – providing misleading information in support of an employees application for a COA is unsatisfactory conduct – fine and reprimand.
Police v Dellaway – disqualifying conviction under s 62(f)(vi) – mandatory ground for cancellation – COA cancelled and company licence suspended under s43(6) for failing to file annual returns
Police v Singh - Disqualifying convictions - no longer suitable to be a security worker - COA and company licence cancelled.
Police complaint upheld - Seki Security Ltd employing non-COA holders - CIPU report - allegations substantiated - breach of condition - company licence cancelled - COA cancelled - finding of misconduct - ss3, 43, 45, 73, 74 80, 83 & 96C of the Act
Complaint against security company and director of employing persons to work unlawfully - company in liquidation and licence cancelled by consent - directors COA renewed but on condition that she must be engaged by a third-party licensee and not manage or run a security business for 2 years.
Re SPS Security Limited - Application for company licence declined as company was guilty of misconduct by operating without a licence, trying to cover up breaches of the Act, and providing misinformation to the Authority and CIPU. Guidelines about steps that need to be taken before new application will be considered.
King's Security & Simpson complaint - engaging security workers without COAs misconduct - carrying on work in a voluntary capacity in classes for which no licence or COA is held is not a breach of the Act but can be a breach of Guidelines for Volunteers and amount to unsatisfactory conduct.
Police v Doherty - complaint about running a security business without a licence - no longer suitable to be a certificate holder due to association with a gang and other concerning behavior - finding of misconduct and no longer suitable to carry on the class of business to which his certificates relates
Turner & Waihape complaint - operating a security business without the required licence is misconduct - penalty reprimand and further training.
Application for an individual licence declined after convictions for obtaining by deception and offences under the PSPPI Act of working as an unlicenced security consultant and personal guard – continued failure to comply with responsibilities of a security business owner – not suitable to be a licence holder.
GM Security Services Contractor Limited & Papaliitele – continual breaches of the Act – licence and COA suspended until annual returns filed.
Tigers Express Security Penalty Decision – cancellation of company licence, fine and conditions attached to company officer’s certificate.
Timoti Police complaint – disqualifying convictions and prison sentence – COA expired – Complaint proved – Penalty barred from holding a certificate of licence for six years.
Complaint that cleaners at a shopping mall were also providing security services without COAs established – company providing cleaning and security services now has a licence – education provided and warning given if any further breaches.
Wood penalty decision – reprimand and fine for established misconduct – refusal to grant company licence for Mr Woods company
Magele & Blade Group Limited complaint – sentenced to imprisonment after tax and related fraud – sentence grounds for disqualification - certificate and licence cancelled.
Ioane complaint – running a business without a licence – working without a COA in required class - threatening and inappropriate behaviour – misconduct – disqualifying conviction – no longer suitable to be a certificate holder – Certificate cancelled.
Contravention of the Act by not obtaining approval for new company officer and engaging non licenced entities to carry out security work amounts to misconduct – Penalty fine and reprimand
Wood complaint – running a property guard business clamping cars without a licence, failing to wear ID or produce on response – misconduct established – penalty adjourned to be considered at time of likely company licence application.
Mulock-Houwer & Centive Technologies Limited - application for COA and security licence – application did not have 12 months security experience but relevant experience in related industry accepted – licence granted with conditions attached to be reviewed after 12 months.
Police Objection - company licence - COA - approved on condition - conviction for violence - Police history - ss62, 63
Nia Nia - complaint against a COA holder of operating security business without a licence - contravention of Act ongoing despite being advised of obligations - no longer suitable to be a certificate holder - COA cancelled.
Tigers Express Security and Raymond Deane complaint - various breaches of the Act established which amount to misconduct - penalty decision adjourned for 2 months to allow for company to be sold or restructured - if not licence likely to be cancelled.
Complaint re Legion Security Ltd & Antonio Pailate - running security business without a licence & engaging security worker without a COA - warning given and conditions set for COA to be renewed and requirement for a company licence.
Dubble H Security Ltd’s application for a company licence – Creelman complaint – no evidence of 12 months experience for company licence & continued breaches of the Act – not suitable to carry on a security business – company application declined and COA further suspended – final warning.