Search Results

1. Covid 19 Protection Framework information for the public on entry requirements [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...working to ensure measures are applied effectively, with the overriding principle that the health and safety of every person who works in or comes to court must be protected. • Every person entering a court building will be asked to show their My Vaccine Pass, or evidence of a recent negative COVID-19 test. • A person who shows their My Vaccine Pass or provides evidence of a recent negative test will be able to enter the building. • People who are required to attend court in perso...

2. Health-and-Safety-information-for-jurors-during-COVID-19-v0.5-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 140 KB]

   ...building, unless you provide an approved exemption, or a Judge has given you permission not to wear one. • Follow any physical distancing requirements. • Have your temperature checked. Thermal scanners will be operating. If you are not vaccinated or have not received a vaccine booster you may want to consider whether you can safely attend court or whether you should seek a deferral or excusal. Hygiene Each Ministry and court site has a designated site manager who,...

3. Potae v ACC [2014] NZACA 5 [pdf, 65 KB]

   ...DIRECTIONS [1] This appeal concerns an application for cover for personal injury by accident through medical misadventure alleged as occurring to the appellant (“Hiria”), an infant born on 31 December 1988, through an adverse reaction to vaccinations and initially attributed to her third Hepatitis B vaccine on 29 March 1989 at age 3 months and her third DPT vaccine received a week later on 5 April 1989. The claim was declined by ACC on 1 July 1991, on the grounds that ACC...

4. [2022] NZEmpC 117 QDY v Counties Manukau District Health Board [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...Board (the CMDHB) and that the CMDHB breached its contractual and good faith obligations to her. [2] The applicant was employed by the CMDHB as a nurse. She declined to be vaccinated for COVID-19. After the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order 2021 (the Order) was issued, the CMDHB determined that the role held by the applicant had to be performed by a vaccinated person. The applicant’s employment was terminated by the CMDHB on 9 July 2021 on the groun...

5. [2022] NZEmpC 127 VMR v Aviation Security Service Division of Civil Aviation Authority [pdf, 304 KB]

   ...Authority and the Court,7 and applications for removal in the Authority, and now the Court – but they were also plaintiffs in judicial review proceedings brought in the High Court, which challenged the validity of the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations Order 2021). Following a two-day 4 GF v OO [2021] NZERA 251. 5 GF v New Zealand Customs Service [2021] NZERA 382. 6 GF v New Zealand Customs Service [2021] NZEmpC 162; GF v Comptroller of the New Zealand Customs Se...

6. Benefits of working for our Ministry

   ...including: 22 days holiday leave extended parental leave online professional development portal discount on private health care contribution to prescriptions for glasses flexible work hours where possible enhanced sick leave arrangements free influenza vaccinations free, confidential counselling services. With a wide range of jobs, you also get the chance to gain a variety of skills and experience while developing your career. "There are always opportunities to grow in terms of training and d...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Careers

7. MOJ Benefits one pager A place you can be 2023 [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...healthcare insurance • Discounted gym membership • Contribution towards prescription glasses and hearing aids • Discounted dental care • Quit smoking support • Wellbeing contributions for GP or alternate health provider visits • Free influenza vaccinations • Free confidential counselling • Traumatic or critical incident support • DVFree Tick accredited for employee family violence support • Enhanced sick leave Healthy & Safe Supported Yourself To learn more about...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 180 Malcolm v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...made following a successful application by the defendants for a strike out order against the claim brought by the plaintiffs.1 [2] Five employees said they were discriminated against by their respective employers because they were required to be vaccinated against COVID-19 under an enactment requiring mandatory vaccination of certain workers. [3] Before the Employment Relations Authority they claimed they had been victims of generic discrimination. However, the Authority found t...

9. TD v X Inc [2023] NZDT 179 (27 April 2023) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...Page 2 of 5 7. TD submitted that X Inc passed a by-law as the result of a decision made on 16 November that was repugnant to the rules of club, in particular rule 24.1. TD submitted that the decision to require members to provide proof of Covid vaccinations before they could enter or participate was repugnant to both the rules of the club and the provisions of the law. TD submitted that it is not within the ambit of the power of the club to create rules which impinge on the civil rights...

10. Nelson Standards Committee v Grey [2023] NZLCDT 33 (4 August 2023) [pdf, 271 KB]

    ...the matters we should consider at this stage. This said, the Tribunal acknowledges from the outset the distress that was caused by the conduct of Ms Grey particularly when questioning whether some deaths were related to the government mandated vaccine programme. At the same time, we also recognise the distress of those who felt their concerns were not heard. These people include the family of a young man who, the Coroner has ruled has died because of complications from the vaccine...