LCRO 158/2018 YCH v TSR (30 September 2020) [pdf, 396 KB]
...ordered a fine of $3,000 for Mr YCH’s failure “to adequately address the implications of the boundary adjustment for the CERA process” in respect of which the Committee said the estate had incurred “[a]dditional costs” which included the resource (subdivision) consent application to the Council, and Mr YCH’s 9 May 2016 fee of $7,100 plus GST. In the Committee’s view, those costs “highlighted the conflict” Mr YCH had “acting for both the Estate and MT [QSR]”....