[2022] NZEmpC 223 FGH v RST [pdf, 688 KB]
...the work-related implications of the posts. She said she was unaware of any material changes in Ms H’s wellbeing that would explain why she may have instigated these. [16] After consulting with colleagues, including members of RST’s Human Resources (HR) team, she appointed Ms F, a senior manager who reported to her, to act as a decision-maker with regard to an employment investigation about the posts. [17] On 8 April 2021, Ms F sent Ms H an email inviting her, and a support...