Complaints Assessment Committee 414 v Deepak Goyal [2017] NZREADT 58 [pdf, 235 KB]
...cross-examination that he had a more active involvement in the development. He and Mr Goyal attended meetings with Mr Ragunathan, and he frequently telephoned Mr Ragunathan to discuss the development. Further, he signed the applications for resource consent. [17] Nor do we accept Mr Goyal’s evidence that he had no interest in the development until shortly before the sale of Number 11 was about to be settled. He lent money to Mr Grewal so that he could pay the deposits on th...