LCRO 148/2022 NH v MV (13 June 2024) [pdf, 220 KB]
...was responsible for his own due diligence and was not to rely on anything I might have said. 6 2. DELAYS … There should have been a clause covering the consequence if he breached the clause (by adding a habitable space that would have needed resource and building consent) ie that therefore I would be absolved of obligation to provide CCC …. 3. UNDERTAKING The “undertaking” that [MV] gave to [Law firm 2] I did not know about. See [Law firm 4] comments em April 21 2017 4....