EV v IG LCRO 111/2013 (8 September 2015) [pdf, 100 KB]
...the parties’ recollection of the conversations. [92] In my view, it is unlikely that the Disciplinary Tribunal would be able to progress the matter further, and reference to its jurisdiction may do no more than impose unnecessary burden on its resources. [93] It was my sense that Mr EV advanced his application from a genuine conviction that Mr IG’s conduct required a disciplinary response. However, after giving careful consideration to all the material before me, I see no groun...