LCRO 202/2015 BT v DG (1 October 2018) [pdf, 234 KB]
...allegations to ascertain the date on which Dr DG had arranged the reverse brief. He alleges Dr DG had never arranged the brief, and that, again, Dr DG was lying when he said he had. [47] The Complaints Service must form a view as to where to direct resources. Little turns on the issue raised by Mr BT. Mr BT has a view that whatever Dr DG has said constitutes a lie. That does not provide a reason for the Committee to pursue Mr BT’s allegations. Overview [48] Mr BT has produ...