[2025] NZEmpC185 Lanigan v Fonterra Brands (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 201 KB]
...there has been no satisfactory answer from the union. It further relied on reg 52(1) and directions issued by Judge King in a minute dated 17 December 2024. [13] The application was supported by an affidavit from Fonterra’s Senior Human Resources Business Partner. [14] While E tū did not object to the notice it opposed Fonterra’s application. The union gave four grounds to resist the orders being sought. The first ground was a description of what the union considered c...