Davis & Ors v CAC 20004 & Anor [2013] NZREADT 102 [pdf, 101 KB]
...decision and in the preceding paragraph. An expert Mr Kirkpatrick (a lawyer) was also called. He said that he could find no evidence on the Council file that the ‘limited occupation right’ had in fact been imposed by the Council as part of its resource consent and that it was almost impossible to find any reference to it on the Council file, including the LIM. He concluded that there was no lawful restriction which could impose a limitation on Ms Liu’s right to occupy the apartme...