Search Results

1. Joe - Tataraakina C (2003) 173 Napier MB 51 (173 NA 51) [pdf, 494 KB]

   ...July 1994 at 139 Napier Minute Book 14-26. 4. The trustees are Gilbert Brown, James Hill, Joseph Young, Rere Puna, Ruruaurua Heita Hiha, and Te Whetu Tipiwai. 5. In May 2002 the applicant lodged a proposal with the Trust to utilise the fishing resource on the Trust lands. Minute Book: 173 NA 52 6. By letter dated 24 October 2002 the Trust advised the applicant that his proposal had not been accepted by the Trust and that the Trust had granted Poronui Ranch Limited (PRL) a three y...

2. Warren v Harwood - Hongoeka 7 Block and Lots 2 and 3 on DP 42094 (2007) 197 Aotea MB 299 (197 AOT 299) [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...such a community, even if a 20 metre roadway was provided, that did not mean unfettered development of the land in Hongoeka Bay. Mr Bailey agreed that the current Maori roadway was impractical and ~ 197 Aotea MB 304 any attempt to secure a resource consent to use the Maori roadway as originally intended would meet resistance because of environmental concerns. In other words, he acknowledged that there was considerable merit in confirming the formed and sealed road as the legal...

3. Lohr v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs) [2016] NZHRRT 36 [pdf, 60 KB]

   ...for a plaintiff to test an agency’s withholding decision under ss 27 to 29. Judicial review does not provide a merits review of the kind available before the Tribunal and is a remedy which for most lay litigants is beyond personal and financial resources. It is therefore essential that the Tribunal does not use its discretion to award costs in a manner which might deter lay litigants (and, for that matter, those represented by a lawyer) from the inexpensive and accessible form of just...

4. [2019] NZEnvC 162 Linnell v Hastings District Council [pdf, 378 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC f b2 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under s 120 of the Act MEGAN AND MURRAY LINNELL AND MICHELLE BRYANT AND JONNY BROUGH (ENV-2019-WLG-000014) Appellant HASTINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent RUSSELL ROADS LIMITED Applicant Court: Environment Judge M J L Dickey sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Submissions: Matthew...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 134 Strategic Property Advocacy Network v Auckland Council [pdf, 328 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 13 Lf of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under section 156(1) of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 201 O STRATEGIC PROPERTY ADVOCACY NETWORK Appellant (ENV-2017-AKL-000167) AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE SOCIETY INCORPORATED WAITAKERE RANGES PROTECTION SOCIETY INCORPORATED GM...

6. Family Violence and Sexual Violence Work Programme: eUpdate April 2019 [pdf, 535 KB]

   ...the helm, she’s careful to first acknowledge the contributions of others from grassroots through to the highest levels of government – “I have so much respect for the work done within this sector. At a community level, with very little resource, they’ve given the most vulnerable a voice and, importantly, government have listened. At each end of the system, we have good people working very hard.” Joining the Multi-Agency Team in December 2017, Sarah led the establishmen...

7. Glenshee Station Limited - EiC - M E Hore (4 Feb 2021) [pdf, 4.4 MB]

   PP-1035600-2-248-V2 BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY ENV:2020-CHC-127 In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 And a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago. Between OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant And GLENSHEE STATION LIMITED Section 274 Party EVIDENCE OF MARGARET EDITH HORE FOR GLENSHEE STATION LIMITED GALLAWAY COOK ALLAN LAWYERS DUNEDIN...

8. Fisher v Foster (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...Principle 6. Accordingly, Dr Foster requested the claim be dismissed or struck out. Delay [13] It is acknowledged that there has been considerable delay in determining this strike out application. Until very recently, the Tribunal has had limited resources, which have led to unacceptable delays in allocating fixtures for telephone conferences, hearings and in the issuing of decisions. See, Wall v Fairfax New Zealand Ltd (Delay) [2017] NZHRRT 8. This situation was resolved in June...

9. 15 May 2020 Summary of Justice Budget Initiatives for Stakeholders [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...help reduce the level of delay in resolving issues in the Family Court, and the damaging effects this has on children, parents and whānau. The Budget initiative will: • Establish Family Justice Liaison Officers and produce better information resources to help parents and whānau navigate the system; • Increase legal aid; and • Increase remuneration for lawyers for children to incentivise the recruitment and retention of skilled practitioners. A second Bill focused on str...

10. Te Manutukutuku Issue 6 [pdf, 599 KB]

    ...hearings at Owae Marae, Waitara, to tautoko Chief Judge Durie and the kaumatua of the Tribunal. It was a privilege to be present (see report on page 3). Raupatu research team The Raupatu hearings will take up much of the Divis!on's time and resources over the next few years. To co-ordinate the Division's research programme and manage the large number of Raupatu claims, a small team has been estab­ lished within the Division. The Raupatu research team is headed by Senior Res...