Search Results

1. Chand v Ahuja [2014] NZIACDT 119 (19 December 2014) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...or say an unlicensed person was responsible for aspects of the professional relationship. [16] The usual point of difficulty is what is controllable. Proper control requires that a professional person maintain effective control over employees and resources within a practice. Regardless, there are occasions when professional persons are blameless victims of deception, or other circumstances, and that will not trigger professional disciplinary consequences. However, the issue in this comp...

2. Moses – Hopuruahine East & 12 other blocks (2014) 37 Tairawhiti MB 238 (37 TRW 238) [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...supporting affidavits were filed for Tūhoe Te Uru Taumatua and Tūhoe Waikaremoana Māori Trust Board. Counsel for the Tūhoe Te Uru Taumatua requested an adjournment but that request was declined based upon the considerable amount of time and resources expended on the matter including sending out direct notice and publishing notice in national and local newspapers. I further note that there were no sufficient grounds provided to grant the adjournment. 37 Tairawhiti MB 242...

3. Te Manutukutuku Issue 21 [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...1993 WAI334 Claimants: Peretini Nuku Taua for Ngati Makino Concerning: Land at Matata . Region: Waihi Received: 23 February 1993 WAI335 Claimants: Hamuera Taiporutu Mitere and Hamilton Manaia Pihopa for Ngati Whakaue Concerning: Geothermal resource at Rotorua Region: Rotorua Received: 22 February 1993 WAI 336 Claimants: Des Tatana Kahotea for Ngati Ranginui and Ngati Raukawa hapu Concerning: Ancestoral lands and the Energy Companies Act 1992 Region: Tauranga Received: 18 Fe...

4. [2015] NZSSAA 001 (13 February) [pdf, 35 KB]

   ...considered as a reason for the appellant being excused from repaying the debt. The appellant appears to have been the main income earner in the relationship; she had no need for state assistance. She was apparently skilful in using her financial resources and increasing her assets. [20] We have also had regard to whether the Ministry should be seeking recovery from XXXX. The appellant and XXXX indemnified each other against any claim against each of them by Work and Income New Zeala...

5. LCRO 245/2014 and 156/2015 TM v BS and Law Firm A (15 August 2017) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...of Appeal. Under s 20(b) that would not have been enough to invalidate the notice. [39] The Associate Judge clearly did not express any view that the Court had been misled and Mr TM’s argument is without merit. [40] This Office has limited resources which should not be expended upon reviews that lack merit. Mr TM is on notice that if this issue comes before this Office in any form in the future it is likely that costs will be awarded against him.18 LCRO 156/2015 [41] The co...

6. [2011] NZEmpC 124 Amien v Reipen and Others interlocutory [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...secure his claim before the Authority for unpaid wages and holiday pay, future loss of earnings, bonuses and compensation for non-economic loss. [6] In his affidavit, the applicant describes Mr Reipen as “a multi millionaire with significant resources at his disposal”. He lists a number of companies of which Mr Reipen is the sole shareholder including Awakino Fortune Ltd which is said to own five properties held in 11 titles with a combined rating valuation of $6,920,000. T...

7. ENVC Matiatia party corresp joint memo WML AT 20150703 [pdf, 719 KB]

   Before the Environment Court at Auckland ENV-2013-AKL-000174 In the Matter And In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 of Notice of Motion under Section 87G requesting the granting of resource consents to Waiheke Marinas Limited to establish a Marina at Matiatia Bay, Waiheke Island, in the Hauraki Gulf Joint Memorandum on behalf of Waiheke Marinas Ltd and Auckland Transport Dated 3 July 2015 Richard Brabant/Jeremy Brabant Barristers Broker House, Level 2, 14 V...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 222 Selwyn Foundation v Nayathodan re-issued [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...challenge to the Authority’s substantive determination. It says that it is required to lodge its challenge within 28 days after the Authority’s determination was issued, pursuant to s 179(2). [8] Further, the plaintiff says that the time and resources of both parties, their witnesses, and the Authority may be wasted if the Authority proceeds to hear the merits of the defendant’s grievance and determines these, in the event that the Authority’s preliminary determination was...

9. FFNZ - EiC - R J McDiarmid (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 231 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2020-CHC-127) Applicant STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF RO...

10. 2021-02-25 List of Parties [pdf, 156 KB]

    ...Section 274 Party Lindis Peaks Farming Limited Service via the website Section 274 Party Loganbrae Limited Service via the website Section 274 Party Long Gully Water Race Society james@grapevision.co.nz Section 274 Party Maerewhenua District Water Resource Company admin@waitakiirrigators.co.nz Section 274 Party Maniototo Irrigation Co Service via the website Section 274 Party Maniototo West Side Irrigation Company Service via the website Section 274 Party Manuherikia Catchment...