[2023] NZREADT 15 – Wilson v CAC 2102 & EE [pdf, 230 KB]
...the purchaser did not undertake a renovation of the existing building. It is contended that the only mention of just one tenant being allowed in the existing building was made after the purchaser had built a second building and been issued with resource consent permitting subdivision of the property. The downstairs area could no longer be used for commercial purposes. Ms Wilson submits that such post purchase plan changes are not the responsibility of a licensee. [36] According to...