Search Results

1. 2017 NZSSAA 042 (24 July 2017) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...requirement in s 70(1)(b) for the Ministry to deduct any overseas payments that fall within the criteria of that section is consistent with the purpose of the Act, which is to provide financial support to people, taking into account that they use the resources available to them before seeking financial support available under the Act.6 [22] We are satisfied that this benefit constitutes a benefit, pension or allowance providing for the same contingencies of disability and subsequent...

2. [2009] NZEmpC WC 9/09 Dickson v Unilever NZ Ltd [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...Unilever and a union delegate there. When she was given notice of the termination of her employment he had discussions with Unilever’s management about a monetary payment for Ms Dickson. An offer of a tax free payment was made by the human resources manager, Ms Tane, but was rejected. In any event Ms Tane later advised that such a payment would have reduced Ms Dickson’s entitlement to accident compensation and would not have been of any benefit to her. [10] Following the d...

3. 26.-Evidence-of-Ms-Jo-Healy-Social-Impacts.PDF [PDF, 352 KB]

   ...thaddeus.ryan@buddlefindlay.com Tel 64 4 044 620450 Fax 64 4 499 4141 PO Box 2694 DX SP20201 Wellington 6011 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-WLG-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for resource consent and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project By Waka Kotahi...

4. [2023] NZEmpC 114 Jeon v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...Broadspectrum (NZ) Ltd v Nathan [2017] NZCA 434, [2017] ERNZ 733, applying Keung v GBR Investment Ltd [2010] NZCA 396, [2012] NZAR 17 at [11], and Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Bilgola Enterprises Ltd (1999) 13 PRNZ 48 (HC) at [9]. 4 Bathurst Resources Ltd v L & M Coal Holdings Ltd [2020] NZCA 186, (2020) 25 PRNZ 341 at [19]. Analysis [9] I turn to consider the factors engaged in this case. Challenge rendered ineffectual if no stay granted? [10] As I have s...

5. [2019] NZLVT 002 The Trustees of the Jiong Swee Family Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   IBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC OO.;t of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for costs by s 274 parties under s 285 of the Act AB LOGISTICS LIMITED (ENV-201-AKL-171) Appellant NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent COCAVO LIMITED, ELEVATE HEALTH AND FITNESS LIMITED, CONNECT, NZ COURIERS LIMITED, PERFORMA LINK, POST HASTE LIMITED, SURPLUS DIRECT LIMITED...

6. Auckland Standards Committee v Rohde [2016] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...of a third drink-driving offence and driving while disqualified. He had behaved responsibly when apprehended. After consideration of the same three cases, and allowing for his obligations to clients in the specialised and (professionally) under-resourced area of law, he was suspended for 2 months. Having regard to the additional conviction in the Pou case, and the mitigating features in the present case, we are comfortable that the penalty imposed on Mr Rohde is not inconsistent....

7. Q v I LCRO 41 / 2009 (2 June 2009) [pdf, 22 KB]

   ...light of the fact that the debt was disputed (or at least that he ought not have done so without warning). [5] Lawyer I accepts that he acted for Complainat Q “from at least November 2005 to May 2006”. It appears that this was in respect of resource consent matters. It also appears he undertook a small amount of conveyancing work for the company. At the hearing he did not seek to minimise the extent of those retainers. He also observed that when Complainant Q objected to him...

8. King v Attorney-General (Application to Remove Proceedings to High Court) [2017] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...litigation of this potential magnitude there is good reason to concentrate the hearings in one jurisdiction. This can only be done by removing the proceedings from the Tribunal to the High Court. [19] Finally, there is the point that grossly under-resourced as it is, the Tribunal presently has no ability to offer a liability hearing until 2018 or 2019. 7 CONCLUSION [20] Should the High Court grant leave under s 122A(1) of the HRA for the Tribunal to order that all eight of...

9. [2020] NZEnvC 007 CEP Services Matauwhi Limited v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND AND BETWEEN AND Judge: Judge J A Smith Hearing: Thursday, 16 January 2020 Appearances: As per Annexure B Date of Issue: 0 4 FEB 2020 Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 001 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an Application for Waiver pursuant to section 27 4 of the Act Topic 15 (Mangrove Removal) of the Northland Regional Council Appeals CEP SERVICES MATAUWHI LIMITED (ENV-2019-AKL-000111) ROYAL FOREST AND BI...

10. Estate of Barry v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury) [2023] NZACC 124 [pdf, 235 KB]

    ...injury: (2) Treatment injury does not include the following kinds of personal injury: (a) Personal injury that is wholly or substantially caused by a person’s underlying health condition: (b) Personal injury that is solely attributable to a resources allocation decision: … (3) The fact that the treatment did not achieve a desired result does not, of itself, constitute treatment injury. [25] While her father was in hospital, Ms Barry was the epitome of a caring daughter....