Search Results

1. [2020] NZCAA 01 (7 July 2020) [pdf, 307 KB]

   ...due to the technical nature of the contested evidence, and the legal principles. Potentially more time was required than a typical mid-band case. The Court Rules generally emphasise the objective nature of the issues in dispute, and the legal resources to address them determine the evaluation of scale, and increased costs. [22] The scale costs calculated by the Appellant were based on the appeal equating to: [22.1] A Category 2 proceeding, which is defined to be of average co...

2. [2023] NZEnvC 263 Feeley v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   FEELEY & ORS v QLDC – TOPIC 31 – FINAL DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 263 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN A FEELEY, E BORRIE & LP TRUSTEES LIMITED (ENV-2019-CHC-21) Appellants AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Comm...

3. ENVC Hearing 27Jul15 WML suppl evidence Mark Poynter [pdf, 681 KB]

   1 WML Poynter Ecology Evidence Final v 1.0 22062015 Before the Environment Court at Auckland ENV-2013-AKL-000174 In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 And In the Matter of Notice of Motion under Section 87G requesting the granting of resource consents to Waiheke Marinas Limited to establish a Marina at Matiatia Bay, Waiheke Island, in the Hauraki Gulf Supplementary Evidence of Mark Raymond Poynter on behalf of Waiheke Marinas Ltd Dated 22 June 20...

4. [2017] NZEnvC 082 PowerCo Limited v Thames-Coromandel District Council [pdf, 933 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC c... '(')2 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under Clause 14 of the First Schedule to the Act POWERCO LIMITED (ENV-2016-AKL-000123) Appellant THAMES-COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Date of Decision: 1 if ,J tl N 2017 Date of Issue: DETERMINATION A: The appeal is allowed su...

5. 01.-Evidence-of-Mr-Lonnie-Dalzell-Waka-Kotahi-Project-Overview64017177.1.PDF [PDF, 855 KB]

   ...thaddeus.ryan@buddlefindlay.com Tel 64 4 044 620450 Fax 64 4 499 4141 PO Box 2694 DX SP20201 Wellington 6011 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-WLG-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for resource consent and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project By Waka Ko...

6. Hall v Opepe Farm Trust (2010) 22 Waiariki MB 47 (22 WAR 47) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...the insurers to honour the trustee liability insurance claim for costs and were still deciding on what further steps to take if any; (f) the trustees noted that the farm advisor contract was not completed; (g) Environmental Protection Authority resource consent applications by Contact Energy Limited concerning Opepe lands had been responded to with detailed submissions from the Trust to protect its position; (h) Opepe land titles had been incorrectly vested in the Lake Taupō Fore...

7. [2019] NZEnvC 008 Schmuck v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 4.5 MB]

   iBEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Participants: Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 00 '(5 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN DG SCHMUCK (ENV-2018-AKL-351 ) Appellant AND NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge JA Smith Judicial Teleconference, 22 January 2019 C Prendergast for Mr Schmuck G Mathias for Northland Regional Council M Rashbroo...

8. M v New Zealand Law Society [2017] NZLCDT 15 [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...or profitability of your practice.” [7] The essence of the decision was that the appellant was not a fit and proper person to hold a practising certificate (s 41(1)) because he had been absent from legal practise for over 4 years, and lacked resources to practise responsibly on his own account. [8] Counsel for the respondent in seeking that the appeal be dismissed summarised the respondent’s position as follows: (a) There was a lack of evidence to show that the appellant coul...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 212 Halse v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...not be rendered nugatory by virtue of an award of costs being issued. [14] I accept that a stay would not substantially undermine the benefit to Mr Halse of a successful appeal; however, the absence of a stay would require the expending of resource by him in relation to the issue of costs and his opposition to Progress to Health’s application. Mr Halse is correct when he says that a successful outcome in the Court of Appeal would result in Progress to Health not being entitled...

10. Form 12 Criminal legal aid application Court of Appeal or Supreme Court [pdf, 910 KB]

    ...investments separate from you? No Yes Give details below Item Estimated value Amount owing $ $ $ $ IMPORTANT INFORMATION The income and assets of your partner (or your parents/ guardian, if you are a minor) are treated as your resources in order to determine financial eligibility and repayment of legal aid. However their resources may not be counted if your partner is charged with the same offence. Your partner may be required to provide further information and...