Search Results

1. Regulatory Impact Statement increasing maximum claims level in disputes tribunals [pdf, 506 KB]

   ...maximum claims level in the Disputes Tribunals from $15,000 (or $20,000 if the parties agree) to $25,000 (or $30,000 if the parties agree), as having more low value disputes go to the Disputes Tribunals could free up both District Court and legal aid resources for more serious cases. Data in a number of areas that would assist in evaluating the magnitude of the problem or effectiveness of policy options is lacking. In the time available, the Ministry has not been able to analyse oth...

2. Cost Benefit Analysis: AML Phase 2 [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...activities. The Government loses tax revenue, while criminals get rewarded for their behaviour. The counterfactual involves absorbing the new regulatory and supervisory responsibilities within the established Phase I regulators without further resource assistance, following legislation changes to bring Phase II sectors under supervision in 2017. This is largely unworkable given the size of Phase II sectors and the scope of supervision that would be required to facilitate compliance with...

3. 8 October 2024 MEP King Shag & IBA Preliminiary Issue [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...half-day or part half-day after that; or • For all other applications, the first half-day is free. After the first half-day there will be a $385 fee for each half-day or part half-day after that. The fees must be pre-paid in accordance with the Resource Management (Forms, Fees and Procedure) Regulations 2003. EC4180_NoticeOfHearing The time allocated by the Court provides an indication of your potential liability for Court hearing fees in this case. 2 PROCEDURES At the...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 246 Noakes v Waikato District Council [pdf, 501 KB]

   Noakes & Fruhling Trust v Waikato District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 246 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN A NOAKES FRUHLING TRUST (ENV-2022-AKL-078) Appellants AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Chief Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Last case...

5. Covid-Priority.docx [docx, 6.5 MB]

   ...Ruahine Whaanau Ora Alliance (MidCentral) 99 4.4.9 Maaori efforts to combat vaccine misinformation 99 4.4.10 Koorero whakatepe 102 4.5 The Possibility of an Adverse Public Reaction 103 4.6 Prejudice 106 Chapter 5: Recommendations 109 5.1 Further funding, resourcing, data, and other support to Maaori service providers and communities to support their pandemic response 109 5.2 Collection of and reporting on data relating to ethnicity and on people with disabilities 110 5.3 Monitor the pandemic re...

6. Transcript of PC8 Urban Provisions - Complete [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-128 IN THE MATTER OF the Resource Management Act 1991 of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 8 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 21 March 2022 held in Courtroom 13 Court: Envir...

7. 2021-07-06 Transcript.pdf [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF AND The Resource Management Act 1991 Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 28 June 2021 held in Dunedin Court: Environm...

8. Waitangi Tribunal - Part IV Te Urewera [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 21 .3 What is the Relationship of the Peoples of Te Urewera with their Environment and Waterways, and How Have they Exercised Authority over Resources and Waterways under Customary Law ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 21 .3 .1 Introduction . . ....

9. Waitangi Tribunal - Part 6 Te Urewera [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 21 .3 What is the Relationship of the Peoples of Te Urewera with their Environment and Waterways, and How Have they Exercised Authority over Resources and Waterways under Customary Law ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 21 .3 .1 Introduction . . ....

10. E16 Paul Kennedy - Coastal Environment - EIC - Applicant [pdf, 3.6 MB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ENV-2018-AKL-000078 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) AND IN THE MATTER of the direct referral of applications for resource consents for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America's Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND Applicant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Regulatory Authority EVIDENCE OF PAUL CAMERON KE...