Search Results

1. [2024] NZEmpC 200 Caleys Ltd v Deadman [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...were down one person. Now, a little different if, say Ms Deadman had been incapacitated in hospital or worse, then we would’ve been faced with, with no option but to walk away from business because we just, a company our size doesn’t have the resources to cover that so, and some of those at the Home Show, in particular coupled with it become a busy time of the year, it’s a psyche that when daylight saving occurs, from that period up until Christmas and even afterwards, people...

2. [2025] NZEmpC 124  E Tū Inc v Mainland Poultry Ltd [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...context, because the negotiating party (the Union) is not the same as the beneficiary party (the employees). Ms Griffin made the further point that it is not unusual for points like this to be missed, even for many years, including by large and well-resourced unions like E Tū. Nor is it uncommon for issues such as this to “fester” for years before a claim is raised.20 In the present case, it was said that the Union was not aware that affected employees were not being paid a s...

3. [2021] NZEnvC 175 Shaw v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...utility infrastructure to enable development of the Peacocke Growth Cell in accordance with the Council’s Peacocke Structure Plan as set out in HCC’s Operative District Plan. (e) In 2016 the Land was designated for the purpose of a road under the Resource Management Act 1991. The Land is required for the Project. (f) Construction of the part of the project affecting 144 Hall Road, described as East West Minor Arterial Road Stage 2, is programmed to begin in the summer of 2021/2022...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 213 Coneburn Preserve Holdings Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 5.2 MB]

   CONEBURN PRESERVE HOLDINGS LIMITED & ORS v QLDC – TOPIC 22 – DETERMINATION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 213 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN CONEBURN PRESERVE HOLDINGS LIMITED & OTHERS (ENV-2018-CHC-137) Appellants AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge...

5. Taueki v Procter - Horowhenua 11 Lake Block (2020) 415 Aotea MB 1 (415 AOT 1) [pdf, 720 KB]

   ...and resulting in the removal of flax and other flora. He submitted that contractors were undertaking significant earthworks including the excavation of ponds and the laying of tracks or walkways, without consultation with the owners and without resource consent or authority from Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga. Mr Taueki argued that the works were being carried out on land that is culturally, archaeologically and environmentally significant to the iwi, causing damage and distres...

6. Waitangi Tribunal - Wai 2200 6.2.2 Scoping report [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...compulsory takings of land by the Crown.................... 22 1.4.3. Group 3 ........................................................................................................... 23 Claims which centre on access to and the quality of natural resources other than land ........................................................................................................................... 23 1.4.4. Group 4 .................................................................................

7. Waitangi Tribunal - Wai 2200 7.2.2 Scoping report [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...compulsory takings of land by the Crown.................... 22 1.4.3. Group 3 ........................................................................................................... 23 Claims which centre on access to and the quality of natural resources other than land ........................................................................................................................... 23 1.4.4. Group 4 .................................................................................

8. Exemption order First State Investment NZ Limited [pdf, 27 KB]

   ...access to the Australian-based officer in order to report suspicious circumstances that may arise, and ensure that the AML/CFT compliance officer maintains appropriate qualifications and knowledge, and proper access to key information and adequate resources. 3 This exemption has been granted as there are low risks of money laundering and terrorist financing associated with this specific exemption, and it will allow FSINZL to use the CBA Group’s existing AML/CFT compliance expertise....

9. 2021-03-16 WISE - MOC - ORC evidence [pdf, 201 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2020-CHC-127) Applicant MEMORANDUM REGARDING SUPPLEMENTARY EVIDENCE OF WISE RESPONSE...

10. [2017] NZEnvC 093 Golden Bay Grandstand v Heritage New Zealand [pdf, 48 KB]

    ...of the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 of an appeal under section 58 of the Act GOLDEN BAY GRANDSTAND COMMUNITY TRUST (INCORPORATED) (ENV-2016-WLG-000065) Appellant HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA Respondent of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application under section 316 of the Act GOLDEN BAY GRANDSTAND COMMUNITY TRUST (INCORPORATED) (ENV-2016-WLG-000066) Applicant TASMAN DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent HERITAGE NEW ZEALAND POUHERE TAONGA...