Search Results

Search results for resources.

8518 items matching your search terms

  1. E26 Coastal Processes, Geotech and Engineering, Stormwater & ITAs JWS [pdf, 848 KB]

    IN THE MATTER of a direct referral application under section 87G of the Resource Management Act 1991 for resource consents for the necessary infrastructure and related activities associated with holding the America’s Cup in Auckland BETWEEN PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND Applicant ENV-AKL-2018-000078 AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Regulatory Authority Date: 31 July 2018 Venue: 4Sight Offices, 201 Victoria St West Facilitator: N/A Area of expertise:...

  2. Judicial-Appointments-Information-Booklet-2023 [pdf, 360 KB]

    ...justice. They are designated as Youth Court Judges by the Chief District Court Judge under the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989. District Court Judge Appointments 5 The Environment Court The Environment Court is constituted under the Resource Management Act 1991. The Court consists of not more than ten Environment Judges and a number of Environment Commissioners. Environment Judges are District Court Judges, appointed as Environment Judges under the Resource Managemen...

  3. [2024] NZEnvC 130 Yzendoorn v Hamilton City Council [pdf, 245 KB]

    D & B YZENDOORN v HCC – COSTS DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 130 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 325 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN D & B YZENDOORN (ENV-2023-AKL-167) Appellants AND HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey, sitting alone pursuant to s 279 of the Act Hearing: On the papers Last case event: Submissions in reply by...

  4. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Sensible Sentencing Group Trust (Change of Venue) [2014] NZHRRT 25 [pdf, 49 KB]

    ...instead of Auckland counsel. That choice was made by the SSGT knowing the venue is Auckland. Ms Pender accepted the brief in full knowledge that the hearing was to be in Auckland. [12.2] Although the Director is a statutory officer, he has limited resources and is based in Auckland. The Privacy Commissioner has offices in both Wellington and Auckland but more importantly, he has no role in the proceedings. [12.3] The location of the witnesses for the parties is neutral. [12.4] A c...

  5. DL (Decision to Prosecute) LCRO 164/2016 (26 October 2016) [pdf, 46 KB]

    ...referred to the Tribunal.4 The Court explained that:5 The protection to the practitioner once afforded by the threshold test [in the Law Practitioners Act] is thus now met by other means. The oversight of the LCRO should also assist in protecting the resources of the Tribunal and prevent it from being overwhelmed by petty or trivial cases. [12] Previous decisions from this Office have emphasised the need for this Office to proceed with caution when considering whether or not to i...

  6. [2019] NZEnvC 204 Auckland Council v Noe [pdf, 342 KB]

    BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 204- of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for ex-parte interim enforcement orders under s320 of the Act AUCKLAND COUNCIL (ENV-2019-AKL-000179) Applicant ROBERT WILLEM NOE Respondent Court: Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick sitting alone under s309(2) and s320 of the Act Hearing: at Auckland on 18 December 2019 Ap...

  7. [2009] NZEmpC AC 47/09 Hyro Services Pty Ltd v Speed [pdf, 30 KB]

    ...(in liquidation) (“the New Zealand company”) at the investigation meeting and that after the filing of an amended statement of problem neither company lodged any statement in reply. A communication from the plaintiff’s director of human resources stated that the matter would be dealt with by the liquidator of the New Zealand company, which was the sole employer of the defendant. The investigation was not attended by either the plaintiff or the New Zealand company, despite th...

  8. 2021-05-17 Balquhidder Farming Ltd - R A Armstrong and M J MacGregor - Supplementary Submission 17 May 2021 [pdf, 187 KB]

    ...take from the Nenthorn River. Our take has no implications on any other surrounding property. Through the process of re-newing our deemed permit, we were required to employ an ecologist to examine the health of the river. Matt Hickey from Water Resource Management did this investigation. His findings showed that the health of the river was in a good state. The habitat and fish species above the point of take were the same as those below the point of take, indicating that us taking w...

  9. O'Neill v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal) [2023] NZACC 001 [pdf, 201 KB]

    ...construed or interpreted and applied to the facts is a question of law … . [25] Even if the qualifying criteria are made out, the Court has an extensive discretion in the grant or refusal of leave so as to ensure proper use of scarce judicial resources. Leave is not to be granted as a matter of course. One factor in the grant of leave is the wider importance of any contended point of law … . The Court’s judgment of 4 July 2022 [24] Judge McGuire began his judgment by refer...