[2020] NZEmpC 8 Visagie v WorkSafe New Zealand [pdf, 136 KB]
...than incidentally; (b) a hearing in the Authority is likely to pose substantial risk to the applicant’s psychiatric state; (c) any determination in the Authority is likely to result in a challenge; and (d) the applicant has limited financial resources. [3] The approach to applications of this sort is now well established and can be summarised as follows.2 There is no presumption in favour of, or against, removal. In exercising its discretion, the Court must have regard to th...