Search Results

1. Regulatory Impact Statement Privacy Act 1993 Information Sharing Amendments [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...ethics or professional standards may be developed with a focus on confidentiality and may provide disincentives for public service providers to share information. There also may be information technology barriers. Further, some agencies may lack the resources to respond to requests for information from other agencies. There is also the concern that sharing information with other agencies may undermine trusting relationships with clients or discourage clients from providing complete and...

2. [2022] NZEnvC 163 11 Cheshire Street Body Corporate v Auckland Council [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   11 Cheshire Street Body Corporate v Auckland Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 163 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under section 120 the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN 11 CHESHIRE STREET BODY CORPORATE (ENV-2021-AKL-63) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey, sitting alone pursuant to s 279(1) of the Act Date of Order: 26 August 20...

3. [2019] NZEmpC 195 The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections v JCE [pdf, 377 KB]

   ...ten unlocked prisoners on his own. Part of the Authority’s consideration of the duties owed to the defendant was an analysis of staffing requirements in the wing by reference to three departmental documents; a Workplace Development Project, a Resource Allocation Model for Corrections Officers issued on 29 June 2012 and a document labelled Workplace Development Staff Resourcing Model User Guide from August 2002 (collectively described as User Guides). [5] The Authority concluded...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 236 Strategic Property Advocacy Network (SPAN) v Auckland Council [pdf, 374 KB]

   ...KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Court: Judge M Harland Date of Decision: Date of Issue: 1 3 DEC 2018 Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 23 6 of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 and the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) of an appeal under s 156( 1) of the LGATPA STRATEGIC PROPERTY ADVOCACY NETWORK (SPAN) ENV-2017-AKL-000167 Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT [A] I dec...

5. Dr Phil Ross - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Auckland Registry ENV 2015 AKL 0000134 IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal under Clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act TRUSTEES OF MOTITI ROHE MOANATRUST Appellant BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF DR PHIL ROSS ON BEHALF OF MOTITI ROHE MOANA TRUST 26th October 2017 Counsel Acting RB Enright Barrister Level 1, Stan beth House 28 Customs St East B...

6. Busby - Okokori B (2012) 50 Taitokerau MB 9 (50 TTK 9) [pdf, 120 KB]

   ...Okokori B contains urupā. 2 80 Northern MB 361A (80 N 361A) 3 81 Northern MB 291 (81 N 291) 50 Taitokerau MB 13 [12] Third, Mr Burgoyne quoted and relied on ss 231 and 232 of the Resource Management Act 1991. In fact, the sections Mr Burgoyne quoted were repealed and substituted by s 124 of the Resource Management Amendment Act 1993. In any event, Mr Burgoyne’s point in referring to these sections appeared to b...

7. Kururangi - Wharekahika A13 (Potaka Marae) (2004) 68 Ruatōria MB 211 (68 RUA 211) [pdf, 677 KB]

   ...consider whether or not the existing gazette notice for Potaka was appropriate, the number of trustees for Potaka Marae and the appointment of trustees to the Marae. The beneficiaries were asked to consider compliance with the Building Act 1991, the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Fisheries Act of 1983 and 1996, or whether or not the hatchery and hauora buildings should be leased by . the Marae trustees. 23. The meeting was scheduled for 31 July 2004 and was advertised in the Gisbo...

8. [2020] NZEmpC 150 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...AVL.4 The seventh ground relates to a witness summons, issued on Ms Shaw’s behalf on 11 September 2020, requiring the former Chief Executive of the DHB, Philip Cammish, to give evidence. [17] The eighth ground is that Mr Halse has limited resources and there is a disparity between him and counsel for the DHB, Mr Beech. This ground, while acknowledging a disparity, did so by referring back to the earlier assertion that the DHB’s evidence was incomplete and claimed that it had...

9. OIA-94525.pdf [pdf, 8.2 MB]

   ...Programme 2021-2023 Briefing from the Ministry of Justice to the Minister of Justice 14 December 2020 [Out of scope – pages 1-8] Notes to Appendix 1 [Out of scope – paras 1-9] 10. Projects that have simply been paused or deferred until resources become available have not been included on the work programme for the time being. They have been moved to our ‘holding pen’ list of potential projects which we will discuss with you further as and when resources allow. These projects i...

10. Fish & Game – Supplementary – B Farrell – Planning (23 March 2021) [pdf, 246 KB]

    In the Environment Court of New Zealand Christchurch Registry I Mua I Te Kōti Taiao o Aotearoa Ōtautahi Rohe ENV-2020-CHC-127 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago Otago Regional Council Applicant Supplementary Evidence of Ben Farrell on behalf of Otago Fish and Game Council and Central South Island Fish and Game