Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 124 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...the court. TO // QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL ATTENTION // PLANNING POLICY TEAM Full name of submitter(s): SUBMITTER DETAILS – ADDRESS FOR SERVICE Organisation (if relevant): Email: Postal address: Phone (inc. area code): Mobile: PRIVACY ACT 1993 Please note that submissions are public information. Information on this form including your name and submission will be accessible to the media and public as part of the decision-making process. Council is required to make thi...

2. Director of Proceedings v Nelson [2013] NZHRRT 38 [pdf, 275 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 38 Reference No. HRRT 026/2012 UNDER SECTION 50 OF THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND RUTH NELSON DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms K Anderson, Member Ms WV Gilchrist, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr A Martin, Director of Proceedings, Plaintiff and Ms H Cook Mr AC Beck for de

3. OIA-112335.pdf [pdf, 27 MB]

   ...and the Ministry, please refer to table 1 below which details the documents in scope of your request and my decision on their release. Some information has been withheld under the following provisions of the Act: • section 9(2)(a) to protect privacy of natural persons, • section 9(2)(f)(iv) to maintain the constitutional conventions that protect confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers and officials, • section 9(2)(g)(i) to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs...

4. OIA-111174.pdf [pdf, 25 MB]

   ...Zealand, • section 6(b)(i) as its release would prejudice the entrusting of information to the Government of New Zealand on a basis of confidence by the Government of any other country or any agency of such a Government, • section 9(2)(a) to protect privacy of natural persons, • section 9(2)(f)(iv) to maintain the constitutional conventions that protect confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers and officials, S9(2)(a) S9(2)(a) S9(2)(a) • section 9(2)(g)(i) to maintain the...

5. Process evaluation of the Election Access Fund Act (2020): after the first use of the Fund [pdf, 776 KB]

   ...Applications Panel were interviewed. 4 • Political Parties: No interviews were undertaken with party officials. The Commission had already contacted them as part of their review and none agreed to take part. Interviewing process To satisfy privacy requirements and our ethics protocols, the Commission first gained consent to pass over contact details to our research team for all potential interviewees. We produced an information sheet for interviewees including in acces...

6. Process evaluation of the Election Access Fund Act (2020): after the first use of the Fund (Read only) [docx, 773 KB]

   ...interviewed. 4 · Political Parties: No interviews were undertaken with party officials. The Commission had already contacted them as part of their review and none agreed to take part. [bookmark: _Toc160439575] Interviewing process To satisfy privacy requirements and our ethics protocols, the Commission first gained consent to pass over contact details to our research team for all potential interviewees. We produced an information sheet for interviewees including in accessible formats an...

7. Adoption Law Reform Targeted Engagement Report [pdf, 3.6 MB]

   ...principles of whānaungatanga (partnership), manaakitanga (protection), kōtahitanga (participation) and whakapono (integrity) were embedded in our consultation and engagement. Our engagement aligned with Ethics Committee considerations: • We ensured privacy and confidentiality of the participants • Participants were supported so their consent is informed • All participation was voluntary • We only published experience details with permission • Our data handling protoco...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 69 Head v IRD [pdf, 679 KB]

   ...requirements and capabilities. IR’s Code of Conduct [114] The final document which the plaintiffs received at the outset was IR’s Code. [115] Under the MSA, personnel were required to acknowledge the Code, as well as health and safety, privacy, and tax secrecy requirements. [116] The Code was introduced in 2008, and according to its text, updated in June 2016 to include a reference to the recently enacted Health and Safety at Work Act 2015. Its essentials are longstandin...

9. [2018] NZEmpC 151 Ovation New Zealand Ltd v The New Zealand Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Inc [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...these factors, it held that Mr Dickson was significantly constrained during a sleepover, because he could only engage in a very limited range of activities, could not carry on normal family life or socialise with friends, was subject to limited privacy, did not have access to the 79 Idea Services Ltd v Dickson, above n 24. 80 At [63], citing New Zealand Fire Service Commission v New Zealand Professional Firefighters Union [2007] 2 N...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 143 O’Connor v Auckland University Students Assoc Inc [pdf, 441 KB]

    ...trustee of the Services Trust. That there appeared to be issues relating to him and the reinstatement of payment of his General Manager salary by AUSA after he ceased to be an Executive Director of Bacchid. That there had been a breach of his privacy with regard to his employment agreement being left on a photocopier for anyone to see. [100] A disciplinary meeting was held on 22 August 2012. This was attended by Ms Williams and Mr Haines assisted by Ms Bull for AUSA,...