Search Results

1. The Trustees of the Tauwhao Te Ngare Trust v Shaw - Tauwhao Te Ngare Block and a preliminary decision of the Chief Judge at 2013 CJ 567 [2014] Māori Appellate Court MB 394 (2014 APPEAL 394) [pdf, 377 KB]

   ...to remain or if some variation on it were imposed, then the hapū would rightly be concerned about access by members of the public to these areas, the urupā, marae and foreshore reserve. They are as entitled as anyone to have their rights to privacy and for the quiet enjoyment of their land respected without the prospect of trespassers interfering with those rights. [105] If Mr Shaw were to agree with the trustees a licence for up to 14 years, the appellants would then have some...

2. Regulatory Impact Statement: Changing name suppression settings in sexual violence cases [pdf, 350 KB]

   ...amendments to name suppression laws to better support a complainant’s autonomy over their own name suppression. The current Bill: reflects an expanded purpose of name suppression, specifying the importance of both protecting a complainant’s privacy and supporting a complainant’s autonomy requires the court to consider any views of the complainant about the publication of identifying details, and requires applications to lift complainant name suppression to be made in accord...

3. LCRO 47/2024 OZ v HD (22 November 2024) [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...direct such publication of his or her decision as the Review Officer considers necessary or desirable in the public interest. “Public interest” engages issues such as consumer protection, public confidence in legal services and the interests and privacy of individuals. [215] Having had regard to the issues raised by this review, I have concluded that it is desirable in the public interest that this decision be published in a form that does not identify the parties or others involved...

4. [2024] NZACC 141 NF v ACC (Impairment Assessment, Independence Allowance) (21 August 2024) [pdf, 357 KB]

   ...the 10% minimum threshold for payment of an independence allowance. Orders Prohibiting Publication of Appellant’s Identifying Particulars [5] Counsel for NF applied for orders prohibiting publication of the appellant’s name to protect his privacy, given the sensitive nature of the facts in this case, including a history of abuse. That was not opposed by the Corporation. 1 Accident Compensation Corporation v Bartels [2006] NZAR 680 at [65]; Atapattu-Weerasinghe v Accident...

5. [2024] NZEmpC 84 E Tū Inc v Singh [pdf, 378 KB]

   ...number of serious complaints of harassment against E tū staff, one of whom was Mr Singh. Ms Mackintosh asked HVF to put her complaints in writing, which she did. The email set out a lengthy list of allegations, including defamation, breach of privacy, mental and physical harassment, promoting wrong information and hate speech against HVF’s business, provoking staff against her and causing loss of her business. Various communications were attached, which were said to be copies of...

6. LCRO 86/2022 PR v KG and VW (12 November 2024) [pdf, 499 KB]

   ...the work to be done, who will do it and the way the services will be provided;  Charge you a fee that is fair and reasonable and let you know how and when you will be billed; 21  Give you clear information and advice;  Protect your privacy and ensure appropriate confidentiality;  Treat you fairly, respectfully and without discrimination;  Keep you informed about the work being done and advise you when it is completed;  Let you know how to make a complaint an...

7. OIA-Audio-visual techniques [pdf, 4.4 MB]

   ...address for bail, so he has been bailed to a half-way house that his lawyer helped to organise. In the house he shares a room with four other men. Eric received an email telling him that his hearing was to be conducted remotely however there is no privacy in the halfway house, and he has nowhere else he can go. He works as a delivery driver and is on the road all day. He has a cell phone and could use this to attend the hearing however he only has limited amount of monthly data and mi...

8. OIA-118472.pdf [pdf, 2.2 MB]

   ...your request, those of a transactional and administrative nature have been excluded. Some information has been removed as out of scope and some information is withheld under the following sections of the Act: • section 9(2)(a) to protect the privacy of natural persons, • section 9(2)(f)(iv) to maintain the constitutional conventions that protect confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers and officials, and • section 9(2)(g)(i) to maintain the effective conduct of public affair...

9. 14.02.2023 Long Term Insights Briefing The Future of Imprisonment II FINAL [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...responses will be anonymous. We will combine your answers to the questions with the answers provided by other respondents. This means that no one will be identifiable in any analysis or reporting. You can read more about Research New Zealand’s privacy policy here. If you would like the text to appear larger in the survey, please tick this button. Research New Zealand September 2022 2 About you 1. Are you …? 1 ..... Male 2 ..... Female 3 ..... Gender diverse...

10. LCRO 103/2021 & LCRO 58/2022, LCRO 104/2021 and LCRO 105/2021 GS v ABC Ltd & HY, [Law Firm A] v ABC Ltd & HY and SW v [Area] Standards Committee [X] (24 November 2022) [pdf, 595 KB]

    LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2022] NZLCRO 126 Ref: LCRO 103/2021 LCRO 058/2022 LCRO 104/2021 LCRO 105/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN GS Applicant AND AND BETWEEN AND AND BETWEEN AND ABC LTD and HY Responden