Search Results

1. Legal aid practice standards for all legal aid providers [pdf, 522 KB]

   ...provide adequate back up in case of illness or other genuine unavailability. 2.11 Supervise adequately and have a plan for the review and supervision of any person undertaking legal aid work under their supervision. 2.12 Take care to maintain the privacy interests of people named in Court documents so that unintended parties do not obtain access to personal information. 5 General Responsibilities to Clients Legal Aid Funding Where a client may be eligible...

2. Responding together: an integrated report evaluating the aims of the Waitakere Family Violence Court protocols [pdf, 894 KB]

   ...included and to make any additional comments. Participants returned the transcripts with signed release forms authorising their use in the analysis stage. As well as the research method detailed above, this research ensured the confidentiality and privacy of the participants and minimised any risk of potential harm to participants and researcher through incorporating the following elements. No information that could identify participants has been given to any person outside the researc...

3. Cooper v Standards Committee LCRO 280/2013, 281/2013, 324/2013, 325/2013, 34/2014, 118/2014 (17 April 2015) [pdf, 406 KB]

   ...provides: When deciding whether to publish the identity of a person who is the subject of a censure order, a Standards Committee and the Board must take into account the public interest and, if appropriate, the impact of publication on the interests and privacy of - (a) the complainant; and (b) clients of the censured person; and (c) relatives of the censured person; and (d) partner, employers, and associates of the censured person; and (e) the censured person....

4. [2023] NZREADT 11 - CAC 2103 v Lieven (15 May 2023) [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...(d) of the RTA. (b) Ms Lieven had not breached s 48(3)(b) of the RTA as no viewings of the property had taken place. (c) Ms Lieven’s conduct breached s 38(2) of the RTA in that she interfered with the tenants’ reasonable peace, comfort or privacy. 5 (d) The tenants had acted reasonably to seek basic conditions for entry under s 48(3A) of the RTA. (e) Ms Lieven’s response to the tenants after the complainant issued a trespass notice – “Then I’ll sue you for each...

5. [2023] NZEmpC 191 Appleton v Tasman Cargo Airlines Pty Ltd [pdf, 311 KB]

   ...FCOM checklist”. It says that they had previously raised concerns that the FCOM and the PPM have not been clear in what they have purported to instruct. It also raises concerns over training, the document trail used to support the decision, privacy in relation to the video evidence used and the provision of information. The letter does not dispute that a walkaround is required for all flights but questions what the walkaround should entail, specifically where the pilot is require...

6. [2024] NZREADT 10 - IH v REAA (12 April 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...purchasers and third parties, but stating the names of the licensee and the agency. [107] Having regard to the interests of the public in the transparency of the Tribunal’s jurisprudence and in knowing of wrongdoing by licensees, as well as the privacy of the people involved, it is appropriate to order publication without identifying the appellant (purchaser), but naming the licensee and the agency. ___________________ D J Plunkett Chair ___________________ P N...

7. [2009] NZEmpC WC 17/09 Idea Services Ltd v Dickson [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...of the constraints on Mr Dickson in this case. Their combined effect is that, while engaged on sleepovers, Mr Dickson can only engage in a very limited range of activities. He cannot carry on normal family life or socialise with friends. His privacy is limited. He does not have access to the comforts and resources of his home. He must be sober and quiet. We regard those constraints as substantial and significant. [66] The second factor is the nature and extent of responsibilit...

8. BORA Criminal Record (Expungement of Convictions for Historical Homosexual Offences) Bill [pdf, 8.6 MB]

   ...historical offence has the meaning given to it by section 5 including means including without limitation (to the matters specified) law enforcement agency means— (a) an agency that holds, or has access to, information described in Sched- ule 5 of the Privacy Act 1993; and (b) the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment, the Inland Reve- nue Department, and the New Zealand Customs Service legal proceeding means— (a) a proceeding conducted by a court, or by a person acting...

9. Marshall v Ratu - Whangape Lot 65B Sec 2A Block (2021) 227 Waikato Maniapoto MB 148 (227 WMN 148) [pdf, 400 KB]

   ...considers that the steps taken in mitigation are not reasonable, the trespasser must show why that is the case. All the circumstances of the case are relevant in assessing reasonableness. (f) General damages may be awarded for interference with privacy and quiet enjoyment of land, and for distress and anxiety caused by the intrusion. (g) Aggravated damages may be awarded in the case of deliberate trespass in arrogant disregard for ownership rights. Exemplary damages may be awarde...

10. SV v WT LCRO 21/2013 (26 August 2014) [pdf, 110 KB]

    ...the context in which Mr SV’s complaint about the invoice arose. Nor did it ask how Mr GN could be expected to know whether or not he would be placing Mr WT in a conflict of interest situation, which should have been impossible if client privacy and confidentiality had been effectively and properly managed in Mr WT’s office. It was also incongruous for Mr WT to say that he could access Mr GN’s database and be able to say the invoice was saved there. Further Inquiries...