LCRO 42/2022 QA v Kennelly (19 April 2023) [pdf, 232 KB]
...father”. [35] Mr Kennelly is unsure how GA was transported to his office, and advises that he had arrived early for the appointment. He says this meant that Mr Kennelly did not have time to prepare the Letter of Engagement. He says: I went through with him the deed of gift and I told him that [he] had spoken to his son and that he needed to approve it before [he] could send it on to be relied upon. [36] Mr Kennelly says that the payment was “never a loan nor was it conditional...